Christopher J. Albertyn

Board abridges time for responses and directs employer to provide employee list for representation vote.

The applicant trade union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor trade union.

The Board issued a preliminary decision abridging the time for filing responses and directing the employer to provide the names and positions of all employees in the bargaining unit in preparation for a representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 220, 2001 CanLII 11023

Christopher J. Albertyn

Representation vote ordered in trade union successor rights application.

The applicant trade union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor trade union.

As there were no objections to holding a representation vote, the Board ordered a vote to determine whether the employees in the bargaining unit wish to be represented by the applicant or the predecessor union.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 268, 2001 CanLII 11706

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board proposes abridging time limits for responses to expedite representation vote for union successor rights.

The applicant trade union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor trade union.

The applicant and the predecessor union agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote among the employees in the bargaining unit.

To expedite the vote, the Board proposed abridging the usual time limit for filing responses and interventions, directing the employer and any interested employees to advise the Board of any objections by a specified date.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 13132

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board directed parties to advise of any objections to abridging time limits for a representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union.

The unions agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote.

The Board directed interested parties to advise whether they objected to abridging the time limit for filing responses and interventions to facilitate a prompt vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 12437

Christopher J. Albertyn

Time abridged and employer directed to provide employee list for representation vote in successor union application.

The applicant union, CAW-Canada, applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union, SEIU Local 210.

The Board abridged the time for filing responses and interventions, directed the employer to provide the names and positions of all employees in the bargaining unit, and ordered the employer to post the decision in the workplace in preparation for a likely representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 15413

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board issues procedural directions and orders employer to provide employee list for union representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The Board issued procedural directions, abridging the time for filing responses and directing the employer to provide a list of employees in the bargaining unit in preparation for a representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 19811

Christopher J. Albertyn

Time abridged for responses and employer directed to provide employee list in union successor rights application.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The Board abridged the time for filing responses and directed the employer to provide a list of employees in the bargaining unit and post the decision in the workplace.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 220, 2001 CanLII 11830

Christopher J. Albertyn

Time abridged and employer directed to provide employee list for representation vote in union successor rights application.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union.

The Board abridged the time for filing responses and interventions, and directed the employer to provide the names and positions of all employees in the bargaining unit, as well as proposals for a representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 220, 2001 CanLII 8829

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board proposes abridging time limits for responses to expedite union representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The parties agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote.

The Board directed the parties to advise if they objected to abridging the time limit for filing responses and interventions to expedite the vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 13460

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board proposes abridging time limits for responses to expedite representation vote in successor rights application.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The applicant and the predecessor union agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote among the employees in the bargaining unit.

To expedite the vote, the Board proposed abridging the usual time limit for filing responses and interventions, directing the parties to advise of any objections by a specified date.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 11043

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board abridges time for responses and directs employer to provide employee list for representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union.

The Board amended the style of cause, abridged the time for filing responses and interventions, and directed the employer to provide a list of employees in the bargaining unit in preparation for a likely representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 183, 2001 CanLII 13973

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board abridges response time and directs employer to provide employee list for representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The Board abridged the time for filing responses and directed the employer to provide a list of bargaining unit employees and proposals for a representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 183, 2001 CanLII 17326

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board proposes abridging time limits for responses to expedite a union succession representation vote.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The unions agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote.

The Board directed the responding parties and interested employees to advise if they objected to abridging the time limit for filing responses to expedite the vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 15004

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board proposes abridging time limits for responses to expedite representation vote for union successor rights.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

The applicant and the predecessor union agreed that the application would be determined by a representation vote among the employees in the bargaining unit.

To facilitate a prompt vote, the Board proposed abridging the usual time limit for filing responses and interventions, directing the parties and interested employees to advise of any objections by July 12, 2001.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 13419

Christopher J. Albertyn

Time extended for employer and employees to respond to union successor rights application due to lack of notice.

The applicant union sought a declaration of successor rights under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board had previously issued decisions abridging the response time, but the responding employer did not receive them.

The Board directed the employer to post the previous decision and extended the time for any objections to the abridgement of the response time.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 220, 2001 CanLII 13051

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board abridges time for responses and orders employer to provide employee list in union succession application.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights of a predecessor trade union.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 183, 2001 CanLII 14572

Christopher J. Albertyn

Board issues procedural directions and abridges time for responses in union succession application.

The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union.

The Board abridged the time for filing responses and interventions, and directed the employer to provide the names and positions of all employees in the bargaining unit and to advise the Registrar of any proposals for a representation vote.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Service Employees International Union Local 210, 2001 CanLII 18349

Board dismisses both parties' reconsideration requests regarding remedies for employer unfair labour practices during organizing campaign.

The union and the employer both sought reconsideration of a previous Board decision that found the employer committed unfair labour practices during a union organizing campaign.

The employer challenged the Board's refusal to bifurcate the hearing, its decision to allow the union to argue damages, and several specific performance orders, including compulsory union meetings and providing employee contact information.

The union sought to expand the scope of damages, recover legal costs, and adjust the timeline for a fresh representation vote.

The Board dismissed all reconsideration requests, finding no important issues of Board policy or obvious errors that warranted varying the original orders, and directed the employer to immediately provide the union with the employees' home addresses and telephone numbers.

United Steelworkers of America v. Baron Metal Industries Inc., 2001 CanLII 2968

Christopher J. Albertyn

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 9, 2001

Board amends previous decision to correct a typographical error.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief decision amending a previous decision dated June 21, 2001, to correct a typographical error, changing the word 'employer' to 'employee' in the first paragraph.

Kira Gerwing v. University of Western Ontario and Ministry of Labour, 2001 CanLII 20219

Christopher J. Albertyn