Board directs two identical applications to be heard together, deferring consolidation to the hearing panel.
The City of Brampton requested that two identical applications differing only in the named responding parties be merged into one file number.
The Board directed that the files be listed for hearing together and deferred the issue of consolidation to the panel assigned to hear the matters.
Representation vote ordered in displacement application for certification between competing trade unions.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent of the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with voters asked to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.
Board defers issue of document production to the hearing panel alongside preliminary objection on standing.
The applicant union requested that the responding party staff association provide supporting documents referred to in its response.
The association argued the documents were confidential and should not be produced until the applicant's legal standing was determined.
The Board deferred the issue of document production to the panel assigned to hear the matter, consistent with its earlier decision to defer the preliminary objection regarding standing.
Representation vote ordered in certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice.
The applicant union applied for certification.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support for a representation vote.
The majority directed that a representation vote be taken and the ballots counted, noting the responding party's agreement to count the ballots.
The dissenting Board member argued that the vote should not take place until the section 8.1 issues were resolved, or at least the ballot box should be sealed.
Representation vote ordered in certification application despite employer's section 8.1 notice regarding bargaining unit estimate.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party credit union.
The Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and that the applicant had established sufficient membership support to order a representation vote.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with ballots from disputed positions segregated.
The dissenting Board member would have sealed the ballot box until the section 8.1 issues were resolved at a hearing.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the hospital participating as an intervenor.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave for the application to be withdrawn.
Unopposed application for union successor rights declaration granted.
The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.
The application was unopposed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the declaration.
The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of the predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.
As the application was unopposed, the Board granted the declaration.
Board grants consent to early termination of collective agreement on joint application.
The applicant and responding party filed a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.
Notices were posted on the employer's premises, and no objections were filed by the deadline.
The Board granted its consent to the early termination of the collective agreement.
Board grants joint application for early termination of collective agreement.
The applicant employer and responding union filed a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.
The applicant, Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario (Hamilton-Wentworth Local), sought to withdraw its application against the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Board grants unopposed application declaring applicant union acquired predecessor's rights via merger.
The applicant union applied under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act for a declaration that it acquired the rights, privileges, and duties of its predecessor union by reason of a merger, amalgamation, or transfer of jurisdiction.
The Board granted the declaration.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.
Request for extension of time to file response granted.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file its response.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline by ten days.
The applicant, Ontario Public Service Employees Union, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, The Crown in Right of Ontario represented by Management Board of Cabinet.
Board granted responding party's request to extend the deadline for filing its response.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and extended the deadline to October 2, 2000.
The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 3261, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, The University of Toronto Press Incorporated.
The applicant, Maria Bhatnagar, sought to withdraw her application against the responding party union.
The applicant, Unite Ontario Council, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Springwall Sleep Products Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.