Union certification granted following a successful representation vote and agreement between the parties.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees of the responding party.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no outstanding issues in dispute between the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a final decision without a hearing.
The Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Application to terminate bargaining rights dismissed as majority of employees did not vote against union.
The applicants filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty percent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.
Consequently, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and directed the destruction of the ballots.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding party union.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Board defers responding party's preliminary objections and adjournment request to the hearing panel.
The responding party objected to the applicant's proposed amendments to the application and, in the alternative, sought an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that the responding party may raise these issues at the commencement of the hearing with the panel scheduled to hear the matter.
The applicant, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local Lodge 1788, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Invar Manufacturing Ltd. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Board orders production of redacted patient files despite Nursing Home Act regulations.
The applicant requested an order directing the respondents to disclose certain materials.
The respondents agreed to provide most of the materials.
The respondent Central Park Lodges Ltd. noted that regulations under the Nursing Home Act prohibited the release of representative patient files without an order.
The Board ordered the production of the patient files with identifying information removed, noting the implied undertaking that produced documents not be used for collateral purposes.
Board directed applicant union to file submissions regarding the timeliness of its displacement certification application.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.
The responding party employer and the intervenor union asserted that the application was untimely under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to file submissions in response to the timeliness issue within two days.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and permitted the application to be withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The responding party was directed to post copies of the decision for affected employees.
Deadline for filing a response or intervention extended to May 4, 2001.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file a response or intervention.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and extended the deadline to May 4, 2001.
Representation vote directed in union certification application despite employer's dispute over bargaining unit composition.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party municipality.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and that the applicant established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with any ballots cast by individuals in disputed managerial positions to be segregated.
Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit of security services employees.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of Westco Security Services Corp. in Toronto.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.
Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.
Representation vote directed in certification application for hospital nurses.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent registered and graduate nurses employed by the responding hospital.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed a representation vote, with provisions for segregating ballots of individuals in disputed positions.
Board amends previous decision to correct the date of a representation vote.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a decision to correct an error in its previous decision regarding a representation vote.
The Board amended the decision to reflect that the vote would be held on April 30, 2001, instead of April 27, 2001, and directed the employer to post the corrected Notice of Vote and of Hearing.
Board orders representation vote in decertification application, deferring union's dismissal request to post-vote hearing.
The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the responding party trade union's bargaining rights.
The Board found the application timely and that at least forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.
The Board declined the union's request to dismiss the application without a vote under subsection 63(16), deferring those allegations to a post-vote hearing.
A representation vote was ordered.
Applications adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matters would be deemed terminated if no request to proceed was made within that time.
Board directs representation vote in application for termination of bargaining rights, deferring union's dismissal request.
The applicant applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party trade union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.
The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty percent of the employees had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.
The Board declined the responding party's request to dismiss the application without a vote under subsection 63(16) of the Act, deferring those allegations to a post-vote hearing.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for certification despite bargaining unit dispute.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification.
The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support and directed that a representation vote be taken, with segregated ballots for disputed positions.
The applicant, United Steelworkers of America, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Telespectrum Worldwide (Canada) Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.