Board granted an extension of time to file a response on consent.
The responding party, BFC Industrial, requested an extension of time to file a response.
With the applicant's agreement, the Board extended the deadline to May 18, 2001.
Board declared union no longer represents employees after union abandoned bargaining rights.
The applicant applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration that the responding party union no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.
The responding party advised by letter that it no longer wished to represent the employees.
Pursuant to section 63(17) of the Act, the Board declared that the responding party no longer represents the employees in the bargaining unit.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Representation vote ordered in certification application for cemetery employees with segregated ballots for disputed classifications.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party cemetery.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with segregated ballots for disputed individuals due to disagreements over the appropriate bargaining unit description and geographic scope.
The applicants, Chris Somers and Jim Weatherby, filed an application against the responding party, Jaylor Fabricating Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the applicants leave to withdraw the application.
Board orders a further representation vote after initial results were inconclusive.
Following an inconclusive representation vote, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed a further representation vote for employees of Prescott-Russell Services to Children and Adults.
The employees will choose between the United Steelworkers of America, the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, or the Ontario Secondary School Teachers Federation.
Application for review of Order to Pay terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay issued by an Employment Standards Officer.
The employer and the employee subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement to resolve the matter.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the Director in trust to disburse the funds in accordance with the settlement, with $1,000 paid to the employee, and terminated the application.
Representation vote ordered and ballot box sealed pending resolution of trade union status.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent performers employed by the responding party.
As the applicant had not previously established trade union status and there were multiple disputes regarding the bargaining unit composition, the employer's name, and the timeliness of the application, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered a representation vote to preserve the status quo.
The Board directed that the ballot box be sealed pending the resolution of the outstanding issues at a subsequent hearing.
Representation vote ordered and ballot box sealed pending determination of trade union status and bargaining unit.
The applicant filed an application for certification.
As the applicant had not previously established trade union status, the Board directed a representation vote but ordered the ballot box sealed.
The Board noted disputes regarding the bargaining unit description, the number of employees, and the timeliness of the application due to an existing collective agreement with an intervenor.
These issues, along with the applicant's trade union status, will be determined at a hearing following the vote.
Employer appeal allowed in part; Order to Pay reduced due to uncontradicted evidence of hours worked.
The employer appealed an Order to Pay in the amount of $3,873.60 for outstanding wages and vacation pay.
The employee failed to appear at the hearing.
Based on the uncontradicted evidence of the employer, the Board found that the employee worked 113 hours at $10.00 an hour and had not been paid.
The Board allowed the appeal in part, reducing the Order to Pay to $1,175.20 (including vacation pay) and ordered the balance of the monies held in trust returned to the employer.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote by employees at the University of Windsor.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of refrigeration and compressor operators, stationary engineers, and helpers employed by the University of Windsor.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure more than 50% of representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification.
Union decertified after majority of employees voted in opposition during representation vote.
The applicants filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.
Extension of time to file submissions granted due to counsel's unavailability.
The responding parties requested an extension of time to file submissions regarding a request for reconsideration, citing the unavailability of their counsel who was out of the country.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the brief extension to May 7, 2001, and allowed the applicant two days thereafter to file reply submissions.
Representation vote directed in displacement application for certification.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union.
Upon examining the application and membership evidence, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite forty percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken to allow eligible employees to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application for certification withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application for certification via correspondence.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and permitted the application to be withdrawn with leave of the Board, directing the parties' attention to section 7(10) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 regarding any future applications.
The applicant, Service Employees International Union, Local 268, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and directed the parties to section 10(3) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 regarding future applications.
Representation vote directed in union certification application with disputed ballots to be segregated.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed a representation vote and ordered that ballots cast by individuals in disputed positions, including students and certain technical specialists, be segregated pending further order.