Board directed written submissions on whether to open a single segregated ballot or order a second representation vote.
In an application for termination of bargaining rights, a representation vote resulted in an 8-7 vote against the union, with one segregated ballot remaining.
The union argued for a second vote to protect the secrecy of the segregated ballot, while the applicant argued the ballot should be opened as the employee consented.
The Board noted its general policy is not to open a single segregated ballot as it would reveal the employee's choice, contrary to section 119(1) of the Act.
The Board adjourned the scheduled oral hearings and directed the applicant and employer to file written submissions on why the usual practice of ordering a second vote should not apply.
Board orders applicant to re-serve application on employer's counsel after dispute over courier delivery to mailbox address.
The applicant filed an application under section 66 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
A dispute arose regarding whether the intervenor employer was properly served with the application.
The applicant delivered the application via courier to the mailing address listed on the employer's letterhead, but the employer claimed it was a mailbox company that prohibited courier packages and returned the package.
The Board found the applicant could not be faulted for using the employer's stated address, but to avoid further delay, ordered the applicant to deliver another copy to the employer's counsel, with the employer to reimburse the delivery costs and file its response within four days.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Service Employees International Union, Local 528, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Winrac Development Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicant sought to withdraw her application against Rand Engineering Corporation and the Ministry of Labour.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the responding party.
Board directs representation vote in displacement application for certification of stationary engineers.
The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of stationary engineers currently represented by the intervenor.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support and directed that a representation vote be held.
Certificate issued to applicant union following successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at Cancer Care Ontario, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Union certification granted following a successful representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of Acorn Packaging Inc. Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Representation vote ordered in union certification application with ballot box sealed pending bargaining unit dispute.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party pharmacy.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and proposed a different unit, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support for a representation vote.
The Board ordered a representation vote but directed that the ballots be segregated and the ballot box sealed pending resolution of the dispute over whether the bargaining unit should be municipal-wide or store-specific.
A dissenting Board member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed strictly pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.
Application for certification dismissed after union failed to win majority in representation vote.
The applicant union filed an application for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and directed the parties' attention to section 10(3) of the Act regarding subsequent applications.
Representation vote directed for security staff with ballots segregated pending resolution of managerial exclusion dispute.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of security staff employed by the responding party.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of at least forty percent.
The employer objected, arguing the employees were excluded from collective bargaining as managers under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, or that the union was estopped from bringing the application.
The Board directed a representation vote, ordering that the ballots be segregated and the ballot box sealed pending resolution of the status disputes.
Representation vote ordered in certification application; ballots for disputed positions segregated.
The applicant trade union applied for certification.
The responding employer disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and that the applicant had established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote regardless of which bargaining unit was correct.
The majority ordered a representation vote, directing that ballots cast by individuals in disputed positions be segregated.
The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.
Union's application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Representation vote ordered in union certification application.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with disputed ballots regarding students to be segregated.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding employers.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Applicant directed to deliver statement to union counsel.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the applicant to deliver a copy of his statement dated October 1, 2001, to counsel for the union within 10 days.
Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit of security guards.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of security guards employed by the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.
Employment standards appeal resolved by minutes of settlement distributing trust funds.
The applicant employer appealed an Employment Standards Officer's decision to issue an Order to Pay.
The parties entered into minutes of settlement agreeing to distribute the monies held in trust, with $2,100 to the respondent employee and the balance to the applicant.
The employer also agreed to withdraw a related statement of claim.
The Board directed the Director of Employment Standards to distribute the trust funds in accordance with the settlement and returned the administrative fee to the employer.
Representation vote directed for security officers; ballot box not sealed despite employer's section 8.1 notice.
The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification to represent security officers at Windsor Racetrack Slots.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined the appropriate bargaining unit.
Based on the membership evidence, the Board directed a representation vote.
Although the employer gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 disagreeing with the union's estimate of employees, the Board found the union had more than 40% membership and directed that the ballot box not be sealed.
Board Member Ronson dissented, arguing the ballot box should be sealed under subsection 8.1(4).
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties for up to one year.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party union.
On agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
If neither party requests to proceed within that time, the application will be deemed terminated.