Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicant requested to withdraw the application.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.
Unfair labour practice complaints adjourned sine die following settlement requiring payment and notice posting.
The applicant union filed unfair labour practice complaints against the responding employer and individuals.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement resolving all differences, which included a payment of $1,600 to an employee and an agreement to post a Notice to Employees regarding their rights under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the matters sine die and directed the employer to post the Notice to Employees for 30 days and include it with the employees' regular pay, in accordance with the settlement.
Applicant directed to file particulars of duty of fair representation complaint within two weeks.
The applicant filed a complaint alleging the union violated section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The union requested particulars of the complaint and an extension of time to file its response.
The Board agreed that the application was not adequately particularized and directed the applicant to file particulars within two weeks.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed due to excessive and unexplained 17-month delay.
The applicant filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging the union breached its duty of fair representation by refusing to take his termination grievance to arbitration.
The application was filed 17 months after the union's final decision.
The applicant claimed he delayed filing because he was waiting for the resolution of criminal charges related to his termination.
The Board found the delay excessive and the explanation unreasonable, and dismissed the application.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure majority support in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and no statement of desire to make representations was filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.
A one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit was imposed.
The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.
As a result, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Certification application dismissed after union failed to win more than 50% of representation vote.
A representation vote was held, but not more than 50% of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statements of desire to make representations were filed.
The Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Representation vote directed in union certification application with segregated ballots for disputed positions.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party in Peterborough.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with segregated ballots for disputed managerial and accounting positions, and noted the responding party's notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Board directs representation vote in certification application after finding sufficient membership support.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and that it established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to obtain a representation vote.
The responding party disputed the bargaining unit description and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Act.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency, with disputed positions to be segregated.
Board ordered ballots from a representation vote to be counted, dismissing intervenor's request to seal the box.
The applicant union applied to represent a group of ambulance workers.
A second representation vote was scheduled following a memorandum of settlement.
The intervenor union requested that the ballot box be sealed pending the outcome of future proceedings, arguing that counting the ballots would prejudice its position that it already held bargaining rights for the employees.
The Board dismissed the request and ordered the ballots to be counted, noting that there was no agreement to seal the box, counting the ballots might obviate the need for further hearings, and any prejudice to the intervenor was diminished because its arguments were primarily legal.
Board deferred various procedural requests to be heard by the panel at the scheduled hearing.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board received multiple requests regarding several complex, related applications involving the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, District 2A, and Ryder Logistics.
The Board determined that given the complexity of the matters, all requests should proceed before the panel at the scheduled hearing rather than being decided in advance.
Applicant directed to respond to responding party's request to dismiss the application.
The responding party requested that the application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 be dismissed on the basis that it is bound by section 3(h) of the Act.
The Board directed the applicant to respond to the request by a specified date.
Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be held.
Responding party granted until August 10, 2000, to file its response.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a brief procedural decision directing that the responding party has until August 10, 2000, to file its response to the application.
Time extended for responding party to file its response.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a procedural decision granting the responding party an extension of time until August 18, 2000, to file its response in the matter.
Applicant ordered to file submissions on whether her employment falls under provincial or federal jurisdiction.
The applicant filed an application alleging a breach of the duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The employer asserted that the Ontario Labour Relations Board lacked jurisdiction because its labour relations are governed by federal law.
The Board ordered the applicant to file submissions explaining why her employment falls under provincial jurisdiction, failing which the application would be dismissed.
Extension of time granted to file responses to amended unfair labour practice application.
The applicant filed an application alleging a violation of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Following a prior Board decision, the applicant served additional parts of his application.
The Board granted the responding party and the intervenor an extension of time to file any additional response to the new parts of the application.
Consent extension of time granted for filing a response to an unfair labour practice application.
The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 alleging a violation of section 74.
The responding party sought an extension of time to file its response, to which the applicant consented.
The Board granted the extension.