Anthony Brown

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the Norwich Public Utility Commission.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the union as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of the Mattawa and District Association for Community Living.

A representation vote was held, but not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the union.

No statements of desire to make representations were filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the union for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for paramedic employees of the responding party hospital.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification for a bargaining unit of maintenance employees at OMERS Realty Management Corporation.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a certificate to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant union and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following an initial representation vote, the parties agreed to disregard the results and requested a second vote.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered a second representation vote to be held, with eligibility based on the original voter list.

The applicant filed a complaint against the union.

The union requested that the application be dismissed for failure to disclose a prima facie case, arguing the applicant did not inform the union of his desire to file a grievance within the time limits.

The Board found that there was a material factual dispute on this issue that could not be resolved on written submissions alone.

The Board declined to dismiss the application at this preliminary stage.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification for employees currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and that it had the requisite 40% membership support to order a representation vote.

The intervenor raised unfair labour practice allegations and cited a Superior Court injunction, arguing against the vote or requesting the ballot box be sealed.

The Board ordered the representation vote to proceed but directed that the ballot box be sealed pending a hearing on the intervenor's submissions.

The applicant, Association of Professional Student Services Personnel, sought to withdraw its application against the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application following a settlement dated March 7, 2000.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support for a representation vote and that the numerical difference between the parties' estimates was not significant.

The Board ordered a representation vote.

A dissenting member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification for employees currently represented by the intervenor at the responding party's nursing home.

Finding that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the applicant, the Board directed a representation vote to be held.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and that it established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to warrant a representation vote.

The responding party disputed the bargaining unit description and the number of employees, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Act.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with the ballots of disputed office and clerical staff to be segregated and sealed pending further determination.

The applicant sought to withdraw her application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant had not yet established its status as a trade union and directed it to file the necessary documents.

However, finding that the applicant had established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit, the Board ordered a representation vote to be taken.

The Board also directed that ballots cast by individuals in disputed office and clerical positions be segregated.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board determined that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and established the voting constituency, with a specific direction for segregating ballots of disputed positions.

The applicant union applied under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, following the amalgamation of Northern Credit Union Limited and Valley Savings (Renfrew County) Credit Union Inc. The Board declared the amalgamation constituted a sale of business.

As the amalgamation resulted in an intermingling of employees represented by the applicant and the responding party union, the parties agreed to a representation vote.

The Board directed a representation vote to determine the successor bargaining agent for the agreed voting constituency.

The applicant union applied for certification.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications for certification by the applicant for the same bargaining unit.