Anthony Brown

D. A. Patterson

OLRBMajority (Wrote the majority reasons)0 cases2000–2001

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in certification application; ballot box not sealed despite employer's section 8.1 notice.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent certain employees of the Toronto Transit Commission.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board compared the membership evidence against the employer's information and found the numerical difference was not significant.

The Board ordered a representation vote and directed that the ballots be counted, with any disputed positions segregated.

A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2001 CanLII 15285

Anthony Brown

Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.

The applicant filed an application against the Toronto District School Board and CUPE Local 4400.

On consent of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

Lillian J. Allain v. Toronto District School Board and CUPE Local 4400, 2001 CanLII 13899

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant with leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 540 v. Beaver Foods Limited, 2001 CanLII 12893

J. A. Ronson

D. A. Patterson

OLRBMajority (Wrote the majority reasons)0 cases2000–2001

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in union certification application despite employer's dispute over bargaining unit estimate.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The responding party employer disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit, proposed a different unit, and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The employer also alleged improper service.

The majority of the Board found the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and directed a representation vote, with disputed ballots to be segregated.

The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Teamsters Local Union No. 419 v. Capital Environmental Resources Inc., 2001 CanLII 11631

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board following the parties' agreement.

The applicant filed an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to an agreement filed by the parties, the Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Christopher Z.E. Sudnik v. A-One Tree Care Ltd., 2001 CanLII 10101

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Robert Higgison v. United Steelworkers of America Local 2020, 2001 CanLII 4821

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Trent Valley Lodge (Full Time Unit), 2001 CanLII 2875

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board on agreement of the parties.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the responding party.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union v. City Ambulance Service (of Quinte) Ltd., 2001 CanLII 2722

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

David Gralewicz v. Thyssen Dover Elevator, 2001 CanLII 2718

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 13, 2001

Representation vote directed for paramedical employees in union certification application.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent paramedical employees of the responding party hospital.

Upon reviewing the application and membership evidence, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant appeared to have the support of at least forty percent of the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Wilson Memorial Hospital (Paramedic Unit), 2001 CanLII 15478

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

OLRBUnanimous0 cases1980–2001

Board directs representation vote in displacement application for certification of school board maintenance employees.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent a bargaining unit of maintenance and service employees at the Waterloo Catholic District School Board, currently represented by SEIU Local 220.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. The Waterloo Catholic District School Board, 2001 CanLII 8867

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit of registered nurses at nursing home.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent registered nurses at a nursing home.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Diversicare Canada Management Services Co. Ltd. c.o.b. Tilbury Manor Nursing Home, 2001 CanLII 20209

Anthony Brown

Board denies request to proceed by written submissions and directs parties to attend scheduled hearing.

The applicant requested that the Board deal with a reference by the Minister under the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act by written submissions.

The responding party objected.

The Board denied the request and directed the parties to appear at the scheduled oral hearing.

Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 2119-01 v. Carleton Place Manor, 2001 CanLII 9828

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in certification application; ballot box sealed due to dispute over employee numbers.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board ordered a representation vote.

Because the responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board directed that the ballot box be sealed pending further order or agreement.

U.F.C.W. Local 333 v. Toula Dining (Toronto) Ltd., 2001 CanLII 19032

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in union certification application.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board directed a representation vote and ordered that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.

United Food and Commercial workers International Union Local 175 v. Racine Independent, 2001 CanLII 14939

Anthony Brown

Board amended previous decision to correct a date.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued an amendment to its decision dated June 11, 2001, substituting the date June 21, 2001 for June 14, 2001.

Walter Pinto v. CAW Local 385, 2001 CanLII 14851

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in union certification application for manufacturing employees.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

IWA - Canada v. North Shore Steel Products Limited c.o.b. as North Shore Industrial Wheel Mfg., 2001 CanLII 14819

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in certification application after employer failed to file a response.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the Algoma District Health Unit.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

Based on the application and membership evidence, the Board found that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Algoma District Health Unit, 2001 CanLII 14560

Anthony Brown

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 6, 2001

Application for review of Order to Pay terminated following parties' execution of Minutes of Settlement.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The parties subsequently entered into Minutes of Settlement to resolve the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the disbursement of the $21,572.42 held in trust by the Director in accordance with the settlement terms, and terminated the application pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act.

Virgo Electric Ltd. v. Glavanov, 2001 CanLII 18386

appearing on his own behalf

Frank RossiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for AFV Multimedia

Tony PatafioAgent
1 appearance

for Borden Cold Storage Limited

Donald G. KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Michael HancockCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Czech Chamber of Commerce

George CornAgent
1 appearance

for Classic Pizza and Subs Restaurant

Kyracos (Ken) LakkotrypisAgent
1 appearance

for Cochrane District Social Services Administration Board

Garry BergeronCounsel
1 appearance

for CriSys Limited

W. J. McNaughtonCounsel
1 appearance

for Dana Canada Inc.

Scott GilmoreAgent
1 appearance
Paul TeepleAgent
1 appearance

for Denninger Limited

Rudi DenningerAgent
1 appearance
Richard DenningerAgent
1 appearance

for EPS Software Consultants Ltd.

Allan MaddenAgent
1 appearance
Paul BarberAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Cuong GiangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hung GiangSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tony TrinhSelf-represented
1 appearance

for International Comfort Products

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Derek WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for International Wallcoverings Inc.

Linda PlumptonCounsel
1 appearance
Gila BellCounsel
1 appearance

for J. M. Schneider Inc.

Ted J. KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
Wayne ShortCounsel
1 appearance

for Lafarge Canada Inc.

J. LibermanCounsel
1 appearance
D. LeoneCounsel
1 appearance

for La Moda, the Hair Cut Centre

Roxanne VignaAgent
1 appearance
Cesare MarascoAgent
1 appearance

for London Health Sciences Centre

Patrick GannonCounsel
1 appearance
Clive GirvanCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorena Herrera

Estée GarfinAgent
1 appearance
Lorena HerreraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nina GandhiAgent
1 appearance

for OKJ Insurance Brokers Ltd.

Brian FujiokaAgent
1 appearance

for Regional Municipality of Niagara

Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union, Local 220

Denis ElliksonUnion representative
1 appearance

for ServiceMaster Toronto West

Ronald G. TrotterAgent
1 appearance
David CroweAgent
1 appearance

for Teamsters Canada, Local 847

Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Fred WoodUnion representative
1 appearance

for Teamsters Local Union #230

N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

H. KopytoAgent
2 appearances
John MarcuccioUnion representative
1 appearance
Laszlo PandyCounsel
1 appearance
Diana DeanAgent
1 appearance
Doug PilkeyUnion representative
1 appearance
Lia AndrewsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim PapadopoulosAgent
1 appearance
Jim GlennySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark FlanniganCounsel
1 appearance
Harry KopytoAgent
1 appearance
Stella MedeirosCounsel
1 appearance
Lawrence PlattCounsel
1 appearance
Michael GottheilCounsel
1 appearance
Mark GallinaUnion representative
1 appearance
Lauri HodginsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Milton VerskinAgent
1 appearance
Jim RenaudAgent
1 appearance
Sylvain PelletierAgent
1 appearance
Barb SovereignAgent
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Monique MarchildonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mr. KopytoAgent
1 appearance
Fernando MedeirosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara GasperianSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ross MacKinnonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert ShewellUnion representative
1 appearance
Donna WhitlaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lincoln NorthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim KitchingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sergio LanciaUnion representative
1 appearance
Kenneth AldridgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew FlockSelf-represented
1 appearance
Premanand SukhooSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rose GattoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph-Giuseppe IantomasiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicants

Rick FrostSelf-represented
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Janet HolowkaCounsel
1 appearance
Henry ErkkilaSelf-represented
1 appearance
David PotinteauAgent
1 appearance
Pam SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Hershel SpiegelmanAgent
1 appearance
Dave FrostAgent
1 appearance
E.J. RobertsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hilary CookCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Andy SkrypniakSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Jennifer StephenUnion representative
1 appearance
Linda RuhlAgent
1 appearance
S. DiFilippoCounsel
1 appearance
Joseé LevesqueAgent
1 appearance
Mary Benson-AlbersCounsel
1 appearance
Jim RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance
Damian RigoloCounsel
1 appearance
G. L. FirmanAgent
1 appearance
Deborah RussonCounsel
1 appearance
Brent BonnerCounsel
1 appearance
Mile KomlenCounsel
1 appearance
Patrick F. MilloyCounsel
1 appearance
Robert CordicaAgent
1 appearance
Christie ZimmerCounsel
1 appearance
Ken JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Daniel L. LeoneCounsel
1 appearance
Judith VentAgent
1 appearance
Carol Ann WittAgent
1 appearance
Dirk Van de KamerAgent
1 appearance
Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervenors

Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Brian AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Labour

Karima ChaturCounsel
8 appearances
Frank CamilleriAgent
4 appearances
Karen NortheyCounsel
4 appearances
Judie ImCounsel
4 appearances
L. EisenbergCounsel
4 appearances
Brian BlumenthalCounsel
2 appearances
Karima ChaturAgent
2 appearances
Jeremy WarningCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SindingAgent
1 appearance
Alicia Gordon-FaganCounsel
1 appearance
Margo MacKinnonCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SindingCounsel
1 appearance
Richard HousenCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie EisenbergCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe FerraroCounsel
1 appearance
Heidi Ann Lazar-MeynCounsel
1 appearance
D. WatsonAgent
1 appearance
Joe FerraroAgent
1 appearance
Mark AlchukAgent
1 appearance
L. EisenbergAgent
1 appearance

for the Regional Municipality of York

Joy HultonCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding parties

L. P. KavanaughCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Jack SullensCounsel
1 appearance
Daniel JoanisAgent
1 appearance
Louise JoanisAgent
1 appearance

for the responding party

Mike McCrearyUnion representative
2 appearances
Linda ColtmanUnion representative
1 appearance
Roger RenaudUnion representative
1 appearance
Brad MacDonaldAgent
1 appearance
Charlie ReitsmaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne PierceUnion representative
1 appearance
Phil FryerUnion representative
1 appearance
Bill JoblinUnion representative
1 appearance
Jerry NelgmansAgent
1 appearance
John AliUnion representative
1 appearance
Kathleen MartinCounsel
1 appearance
Mike ReuterUnion representative
1 appearance
Gerry BastienUnion representative
1 appearance
Fred EngelageSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denise CoombsUnion representative
1 appearance
Dougald BrownCounsel
1 appearance
Frank PodniewiczAgent
1 appearance
Tim RockUnion representative
1 appearance
John DobieAgent
1 appearance
Roy KellettUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Responding party

Carlos PimentelAgent
1 appearance
T. HawtinCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party United Steelworkers of America Local 6720

Ben HaynesUnion representative
1 appearance
Doug BrownUnion representative
1 appearance
Steve NeziolUnion representative
1 appearance
David DooreyCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party Ventra Plastics

John MillerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Farrah Johnson

Sarah SawickiAgent
1 appearance
Farrah JohnsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of himself

Gerrit PaterSelf-represented
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Yara ProchazkaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lois LouisySelf-represented
1 appearance
Sue BarnsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anna McKinnonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Natalie SantosSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy TaylesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle JoyceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marion SchedlerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dorothy RebuliSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tamara DaviesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wilma JacksonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janine CrawfordSelf-represented
1 appearance

on his own behalf

Dann ShermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
William StuartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Conrad DinataleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael VerkerkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave GraingerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick Georgas Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance
Chris KabalaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Yahya MisriSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic PerroniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve StamatiouSelf-represented
1 appearance

702

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

30.5

cases/mo

OLRB702(100%)

Decision types

motion

542

trial

appeal

costs

/Adjudicator

Anthony Brown — Vice-Chair

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Administrative Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Human Rights

Anthony Brown

Vice-Chair·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 2000

702

cases · 2 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 484Vice-Chair· 137Vice-Chair· 70Vice-Chair· Chair· 4Vice‑Chair· 3Vice Chair· 3

J. A. Ronson

OLRBUnanimous0 cases1980–2001

D. A. Patterson

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in union certification application.

The applicant union filed an application for certification.

The Board directed that a representation vote be held, with segregated ballots for two disputed positions.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Cornerstone/Le Pilier, 2001 CanLII 17010

J. A. Ronson

D. A. Patterson

OLRBMajority (Wrote the majority reasons)0 cases2000–2001

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in certification application; ballot box not sealed despite employer's section 8.1 notice.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent certain employees of the Toronto Transit Commission.

The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board compared the membership evidence against the employer's information and found the numerical difference was not significant.

The Board ordered a representation vote and directed that the ballots be counted, with any disputed positions segregated.

A dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2001 CanLII 15285

Anthony Brown

Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.

The applicant filed an application against the Toronto District School Board and CUPE Local 4400.

Lillian J. Allain v. Toronto District School Board and CUPE Local 4400, 2001 CanLII 13899

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant with leave of the Board.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local Union 540 v. Beaver Foods Limited, 2001 CanLII 12893

J. A. Ronson

D. A. Patterson

OLRBMajority (Wrote the majority reasons)0 cases2000–2001

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in union certification application despite employer's dispute over bargaining unit estimate.

The applicant trade union applied for certification.

The employer also alleged improper service.

The majority of the Board found the numerical difference between the parties was not significant and directed a representation vote, with disputed ballots to be segregated.

The dissenting Board member would have ordered the ballot box sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.

Teamsters Local Union No. 419 v. Capital Environmental Resources Inc., 2001 CanLII 11631

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board following the parties' agreement.

The applicant filed an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to an agreement filed by the parties, the Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Christopher Z.E. Sudnik v. A-One Tree Care Ltd., 2001 CanLII 10101

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding party union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Robert Higgison v. United Steelworkers of America Local 2020, 2001 CanLII 4821

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant.

The applicant requested to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Trent Valley Lodge (Full Time Unit), 2001 CanLII 2875

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board on agreement of the parties.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the responding party.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union v. City Ambulance Service (of Quinte) Ltd., 2001 CanLII 2722

Anthony Brown

Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.

David Gralewicz v. Thyssen Dover Elevator, 2001 CanLII 2718

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 13, 2001

Representation vote directed for paramedical employees in union certification application.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent paramedical employees of the responding party hospital.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Wilson Memorial Hospital (Paramedic Unit), 2001 CanLII 15478

J. A. Rundle

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

OLRBUnanimous0 cases1980–2001

Board directs representation vote in displacement application for certification of school board maintenance employees.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. The Waterloo Catholic District School Board, 2001 CanLII 8867

J. A. Ronson

H. Peacock

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed for proposed bargaining unit of registered nurses at nursing home.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent registered nurses at a nursing home.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation & General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) v. Diversicare Canada Management Services Co. Ltd. c.o.b. Tilbury Manor Nursing Home, 2001 CanLII 20209

Anthony Brown

Board denies request to proceed by written submissions and directs parties to attend scheduled hearing.

The applicant requested that the Board deal with a reference by the Minister under the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act by written submissions.

The responding party objected.

The Board denied the request and directed the parties to appear at the scheduled oral hearing.

Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 2119-01 v. Carleton Place Manor, 2001 CanLII 9828

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in certification application; ballot box sealed due to dispute over employee numbers.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members.

The Board ordered a representation vote.

U.F.C.W. Local 333 v. Toula Dining (Toronto) Ltd., 2001 CanLII 19032

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in union certification application.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board directed a representation vote and ordered that ballots of individuals in disputed positions be segregated.

United Food and Commercial workers International Union Local 175 v. Racine Independent, 2001 CanLII 14939

Anthony Brown

Board amended previous decision to correct a date.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued an amendment to its decision dated June 11, 2001, substituting the date June 21, 2001 for June 14, 2001.

Walter Pinto v. CAW Local 385, 2001 CanLII 14851

Anthony Brown

Representation vote ordered in union certification application for manufacturing employees.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite 40 percent membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

IWA - Canada v. North Shore Steel Products Limited c.o.b. as North Shore Industrial Wheel Mfg., 2001 CanLII 14819

Anthony Brown

Representation vote directed in certification application after employer failed to file a response.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the Algoma District Health Unit.

The responding party failed to file a response within the stipulated time.

Based on the application and membership evidence, the Board found that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Algoma District Health Unit, 2001 CanLII 14560

Anthony Brown