Who is Andrew Osyany?

Andrew Osyany is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Andrew Osyany sit on?

Andrew Osyany sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Andrew Osyany decide?

Andrew Osyany's most common areas include Administrative Law (114 decisions), Other Tribunals (107 decisions), Environmental Law (43 decisions). Andrew Osyany has handled 118 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has Andrew Osyany made?

Andrew Osyany has 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004.

Who frequently appears before Andrew Osyany?

Representatives who frequently appear before Andrew Osyany include Husseinali Shivji, Evelyn Hambly, William Cryderman.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Andrew Osyany — Vice-Chair

Corporate/Commercial Law

Andrew Osyany

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1995

118

cases · 10 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 53Vice Chair· 44Vice Chair· 10Vice Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-Chair· 3Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 17, 2001

Municipality ordered to pay $3,000 and rectify spoil banks for failing to consult on drain construction.

The appellants appealed the quality of construction of the Fekete Drain under section 64 of the Drainage Act, raising concerns about the drain's location, tree removal, topsoil stripping, and spoil bank depth.

The Tribunal found the Municipality failed to properly consult the appellants on the drain's location as previously ordered, awarding $3,000 in compensation.

The Tribunal also ordered the Municipality to level the spoil bank to the specified maximum depth of 0.6 metres and install swales to prevent water ponding, but dismissed claims regarding topsoil replacement and brush stacking.

M. and N. Sauro v. Municipality of Thames Centre, 2001 ONAFRAAT 40

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 26, 2001

Application to extend time for appealing municipal drainage works dismissed due to unexplained, excessive delay.

The applicant, a property owner, applied under section 100 of the Drainage Act for an extension of time to appeal the quality of construction and assessment of a municipal drainage system under sections 48 and 64.

The applicant was six months late for the section 64 appeal and over two years late for the section 48 appeal.

The Tribunal applied a seven-factor test for extending time limits and found the applicant failed to provide adequate reasons for the delay or demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.

The application for an extension of time was dismissed without costs.

Bellcreft Beach Drainage and Pumping System (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 37

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 20, 2001

Drainage works approved with minor adjustments to property assessments; appeals otherwise dismissed.

Several landowners appealed the Engineer's Report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the proposed Louks Drain in the Township of Norfolk.

The appellants argued that the drain was unnecessary, the route should be modified, and their assessments were too high.

The Tribunal found insufficient evidence to halt the construction or alter the proposed route, noting the project was driven by the need to provide drainage to residential lots.

However, the Tribunal made minor adjustments to the statutory benefit and outlet liability assessments for specific properties to better reflect the actual benefits received.

The appeals under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act were otherwise dismissed.

Louks Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 35

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2001

Tribunal approved uncontested amendments to a drainage works by-law to incorporate fish habitat enhancements.

The applicant consulting engineers requested a modification to a municipal by-law concerning drainage works to incorporate a reduction in land allowances and the addition of aquatic habitat enhancements required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

The affected landowner consented to the reduction, and the municipality supported the changes.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, directing the engineer to amend the report and the municipality to amend the by-law accordingly.

Todgham and Case Associates Incorporated v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2001 ONAFRAAT 2

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 12, 2001

Crop insurance appeal denied; appellant failed to report increased acreage by the required deadline.

The appellant, Laplante Combining Inc., appealed a decision by AGRICORP denying its claim for unseeded land compensation (Unseeded Acreage Benefit) in the 2000 crop year.

The appellant argued it had coverage for 2,500 acres, while AGRICORP maintained coverage was limited to 750 acres because the appellant failed to report its increased acreage by the May 1 deadline.

The Tribunal found that the appellant did not give effective notice of the increased land base before the deadline and that AGRICORP acted within the terms of the Contract of Insurance in denying the claim.

The appeal was denied.

Laplante Combining Inc. v Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 16, 2001

Drainage assessment adjusted to reflect increased costs driven by upstream urbanization rather than agricultural benefit.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the engineer's report on the reconstruction of a municipal drain.

The appellant argued that the drainage problems were caused by urban encroachment and that her agricultural property was unfairly assessed for the costs of upgrading the drain to accommodate residential runoff.

The Tribunal found that the statutory benefit assessment on the appellant's lands should be reduced, as the report was driven by the need of upstream lands and increased urbanization.

The Tribunal ordered adjustments to the assessment schedule, reducing the appellant's benefit assessment and increasing the outlet liability for non-agricultural and upstream properties.

Suzanne Burlatschenko v. Township of Norfolk, 2001 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 6, 2001

Pre-hearing application to exclude the Commission's decision from the Tribunal's record in a de novo hearing dismissed.

The Chicken Farmers of Ontario brought a pre-hearing application seeking an order to exclude the actual decision of the Farm Products Marketing Commission and any references to it from the materials placed before the Tribunal prior to the hearing.

The applicant argued that because the appeal was proceeding as a hearing de novo, the Commission's decision had no probative value and its inclusion might taint the Tribunal.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the inclusion of the decision and references to it in pre-hearing filings did not violate a previous procedural order and was consistent with the statutory requirement to provide all relevant materials to the Tribunal.

Chicken Farmers of Ontario v Ontario Farm Products Marketing Commission, 2001 ONAFRAAT 7

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 30, 2001

Application to procure engineer's report for drainage system assessment variation granted on consent.

The applicant municipality applied under section 76(1) of the Drainage Act for permission to procure an engineer's report to vary the assessment schedule for the Holland Marsh Drainage System.

During the hearing, the parties agreed to Minutes of Settlement.

The Tribunal granted the application and issued an order incorporating the settlement terms.

The order included cost-sharing provisions for the report and established procedures for a subsequent application to the Referee regarding legal liability issues.

Holland Marsh Drainage System (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 5

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 5, 2001

Crop insurance appeals dismissed as AGRICORP correctly applied the area-based forage plan calculations.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's decision to deny their claims for 1999 hay and pasture crops under the Crop Insurance Plan for Hay and Forage.

The appellants argued that their individual yields were significantly lower than the area-based simulated yields due to drought.

The Tribunal found that the Forage Plan is an area-based plan, not an individual farm plan, and that AGRICORP calculated the claims in accordance with the regulations and the plan's requirements.

The appeals were dismissed.

Horner et al. v Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 18, 2000

Party status granted to interested party in quota dispute; examination for discovery denied.

In a pre-hearing conference regarding an appeal of a Chicken Farmers of Ontario decision on quota allocation, an interested party applied for party status, and the appellant applied for an order for her examination for discovery.

The Tribunal granted party status, noting all parties acknowledged her interest in the matter.

The Tribunal denied the application for examination for discovery, stating such orders should only be issued under extraordinary circumstances, which were not present.

Van Moorsel Farms Ltd. v Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 2000 ONAFRAAT 33

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 12, 2000

Drainage report referred back to engineer for reconsideration of assessments and extent of work.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the engineer's report regarding the Cook's Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act.

The Tribunal found that the engineer's report did not adequately address the drainage needs of all affected properties and that the apportionment of statutory benefit and outlet liability assessments required reconsideration.

The Tribunal ordered the report to be referred back to the engineer for further consideration and revision.

In a subsequent reconsideration decision, the Tribunal amended the deadlines for the municipality to consider the revised report due to upcoming municipal elections.

Costs of $250 were awarded against two appellants who failed to appear or abandon their appeal.

Cooks Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 26

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 6, 2000

Drainage Act appeals dismissed as downstream owners failed to prove the proposed work lacked sufficient outlet.

The appellants, downstream landowners, appealed an engineer's report proposing repair and improvement of the Short Drain Branches A and B. They argued the work should be delayed pending a report on the main drain, claiming it lacked sufficient outlet.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding the appellants failed to provide cogent evidence on any issues and that the main drain provided a sufficient outlet.

The Tribunal concluded the appeals were primarily intended to obstruct the municipality's statutory duty to maintain the drains, and ordered the appellants to pay a total of $4,000 in costs.

Short Drain, Branches A and B (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 12, 2000

Crop insurance appeal denied as agency correctly applied the area-based yield simulation model.

The appellants, five farmers, appealed a decision by the respondent crop insurance agency regarding the adjustment of their 1999 hay crop under the Forage Plan.

The appellants argued that the computer-simulated yield model used by the agency did not accurately reflect the severe drought conditions they experienced, specifically contesting the initial soil moisture data used.

The Tribunal found that the agency had applied the area-based plan and its simulation model consistently and correctly according to the plan's requirements.

As the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to alter the plan or its methodology, the appeal was denied.

Spencer et al. v Agricorp, 2000 ONAFRAAT 21

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 1, 2000

Tribunal confirms Lewis Drain assessments and modifies Maple Avenue South Drain assessments to reflect cause of flooding.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the engineer's report regarding the Lewis and Maple Avenue South Drains.

The Tribunal confirmed the assessments for the Lewis Drain as modified by the Court of Revision.

For the Maple Avenue South Drain, the Tribunal found the work was required but modified the assessment schedule to reflect that the major factor contributing to the need for the work was the construction of berms by one of the appellants, assessing a special benefit to that owner.

Lewis and Maple Avenue South Drains (RE) 2000 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 30, 2000

Tribunal establishes four-part test for the return of new parts upon termination of a farm implement dealership.

Following the termination of its dealership agreement, the applicant dealer sought to return new parts to the respondent distributor under the Farm Implements Act.

The distributor rejected certain parts, arguing they were not clearly identified, were repackaged by the dealer, or were obsolete and not in the current parts record-keeping system.

The Tribunal interpreted sections 27(e) and 27(f) of the Act, establishing a four-part test for parts return.

The Tribunal held that parts in original packaging, custom parts with proof of purchase, and individually numbered parts from multi-packs are returnable.

The Tribunal directed the distributor to reconsider the rejected parts against these tests and to accept those that comply.

Moran’s Farm Supplies Ltd. v New Holland Canada Ltd., 2000 ONAFRAAT 13

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2000

Tribunal approved uncontested amendments to drainage by-law to reduce land allowance and add fish habitat.

The applicant consulting engineers requested a modification to a municipal by-law concerning the Malott Diversion Drain to reduce a land allowance and incorporate aquatic habitat enhancements required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans.

The affected landowner consented to the reduction and the municipality supported the changes.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act, finding that adequate notice had been given and no affected parties objected.

Todgham and Case Associates Incorporated v. Municipality of Chatham-Kent, 2000 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 26, 2000

Drainage Act appeal allowed; engineer directed to reconsider design standard and adjust benefit assessments.

The County of Elgin appealed an engineer's report regarding the Greer Drains #1 and #2 Outlets under the Drainage Act.

The County argued that the proposed 2-year storm design standard was excessive and that the assessments charged to the County for outlet and benefit were disproportionately high.

The Tribunal found that the proposed design, which accommodated the entire storm flow in the tile drain, was unnecessary and directed the engineer to reconsider the design to utilize the combined capacity of the tile and the existing grassed waterway.

The Tribunal also found that the benefit assessment to the County road was too high and that upstream properties relieved of drainage problems should be assessed for benefit.

The Tribunal ordered the report to be referred back to the engineer for reconsideration and adjustment of the assessments.

The Corporation of the County of Elgin v. Municipality of Central Elgin, 2000 ONAFRAAT 7

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 2, 2000

Drainage assessment appeal partially granted to modify assessment schedules and remove certain administrative costs.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and assessments for the Bartlett Creek Municipal Drain Downstream Section under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.

They argued the report was incomplete, the benefits were not commensurate with the costs, and their individual assessments were excessive.

The Tribunal dismissed the section 48 appeal, finding the report complete and the benefits commensurate with the costs.

The Tribunal partially granted the section 54 appeal, ordering modifications to the assessment schedules to properly account for special benefits and to remove certain prior consulting and carrying charges from the project's estimated costs.

Costs of $750 were awarded against two of the appellants for bringing a frivolous appeal.

Bartlett Creek Municipal Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 4

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 1, 2000

Tribunal approved municipal application to modify drainage by-law to accommodate property owner's requested culvert changes.

The Municipality of Chatham-Kent applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for a modification to a township by-law concerning the repair and improvement of the Travis Drain.

Following the adoption of an engineer's report, a property owner requested a change in the culvert end treatment from rip-rap to pre-cast concrete headwalls, agreeing to pay the increased cost as a special benefit assessment.

The Tribunal exercised its authority under section 51(1) of the Drainage Act to approve the requested amendments to the by-law on terms, ordering the municipal clerk to insert specific modifying language and to notify affected owners of their right to appeal.

Travis Drain (Re), 2000 ONAFRAAT 3

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 13, 1999

Drainage report modified to adjust assessments and working widths; appeals for realignment and increased land allowances dismissed.

Appellants appealed the engineer's report for the Foreman Municipal Drain Improvement under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.

The Tribunal granted the appeal regarding the assessment of costs for Green Lane Environmental, finding the original outlet and benefit assessments unfair, and ordered modifications to the working width on their property.

The Tribunal dismissed appeals seeking to divert the drain out of the watershed and to increase the allowance for land used, finding the proposed alignment and agricultural land valuation appropriate.

The Tribunal also directed modifications to relocate a portion of the drain on another property and ordered the municipality to pay the actual increased costs resulting from the presence of a municipal road.

Foreman Municipal Drain Improvement 1999, 1999 ONAFRAAT 30

Page 3 of 6 (118 cases)

advocate for Mr. Mervin Martin

Clifford StephensAgent
1 appearance

advocate for the appellant

Harry DenHaanAgent
1 appearance

agent for Lois Hayter

Glenn HayterAgent
1 appearance

agent for Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner

Allan ButtonAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Alec KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Al YagminasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anna HaasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne CoyneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carl HillebrechtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caroline DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Catherine GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charles FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris BrazeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dan FroeseSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darlene BowenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave ForsythSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denton MeiklejohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SpencerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dr. Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DownSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ethel BarkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Burt HodginsSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Robert AchesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
William EastonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Basilla GrubbeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

William CrydermanSelf-represented
2 appearances

appellants

Edward AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants in person

John WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph FarnsworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joyce ShackSelf-represented
1 appearance
W. J. MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris McArthurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
John McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
3 appearances
Ann WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Murray BeachSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gerry BakerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reg CableSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andy DeverellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Frank WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Serge PharandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Shawn PowellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Wes CraigSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian FumertonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Linda FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daryl LoucksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marjorie CampbellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jim FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steve ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vick HarrisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne FerrisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Adrian BrouwerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 14 Charles St.

Gerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 19 Charles St.

Carl GillespieSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 26 Charles St.

Gerry DeWittSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Allan HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg HoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Albertine CroftSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne VanderbrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard KordyjakaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce Van KemenadeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chester DannSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris ToeppSelf-represented
1 appearance
John OosterveldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Josh FullanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louise LordSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maurice VanhouckeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray LampmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard BeauchampSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rodney McCabeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen ScotchmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stewart McPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvester. PhilipsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer

Dean WebbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard AbrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisting the appellant

Marielle KlijnAgent
1 appearance

Ausauble Bayfield Conservation Authority

Ryan HernAgent
1 appearance

counsel, to Mrs. Beverley Misener

Ralph BenedictCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Callum SheddenCounsel
1 appearance
D. GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Norman Peel, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Sunnybrook Farms

Ron FolkesCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the applicant, the Director of Regulatory Compliance

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Camden

J. WickettCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Mayor, on behalf of the Municipal Council, Township of Enniskillen

Jim BurnsAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Reeve, Township of Brethour

Tom GoddardAgent
1 appearance

downstream landowner

Catherine KwarciakSelf-represented
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

E. Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared the engineer's report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Bradford West Gwillimbury and Township of King

Art JanseAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, for the Municipality of Thames Centre

Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for 1060008 Ontario Ltd.

Doug VollmershausenAgent
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
4 appearances
Judith Kay-SchecterAgent
2 appearances
Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Jim ZavitzAgent
2 appearances
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
Roger GeysensAgent
1 appearance

for Carl Hillebrecht, appellant

Andy McBrideAgent
1 appearance

for Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel BaigCounsel
1 appearance

for Cowan Farm Drainage, respondent

Mike CowanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Evelyn Cleland, Murray Teel, Colin Campbell and W. Christopher Dale

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Fernand Gauthier

Garnet McDiarmidAgent
1 appearance

for Florence McCarl

Jack McCarlAgent
1 appearance

for Francesco and Rosetta Iannialice, appellants

Jack DavisAgent
1 appearance

for Gary Beach, appellant

Al FraserAgent
2 appearances

for George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for Green Lane Environmental, appellant

Anne HiscockAgent
1 appearance
Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Brian BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don KolkeaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WestSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fernand GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. MullerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John SoenenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mervin MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick WallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray SwaimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Willey McLellanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for K. Smart Associates Ltd.

Ken SmartAgent
2 appearances

for Lana Hicks and George Boothe, assessed owners

Bob CarrierAgent
1 appearance

for Margaret Munro

Colin StillCounsel
1 appearance

for Maria Janzen

Suzanna JanzenAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olde York Potato Chips

Donald ShortCounsel
1 appearance
William GeorgesCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter VanKruistum, appellant

Bradley StoneCounsel
1 appearance

for R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for Robert and David Groszeibl, Joseph and Elizabeth Groszeibl, and Mr. William Van Vliet

Christopher WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Schnurr's Country Market Ltd.

Dave SchnurrAgent
1 appearance

for several appellants

Steven RennerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R. Graham, F.&R. Graham, J.&R. Graham, Oakwood Agromart Ltd., 1035485 Ontario Ltd., G. Butterworth et al., J. Everson, J. Garland, J.&J. Hickson and J. Hickson

William TurvilleCounsel
2 appearances

for Thames Valley District School Board

Charles M. AttardAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Peter KlijnSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clayton WattersAgent
1 appearance
Darlene BowenAgent
1 appearance
Donald HorneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Edwin HornerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim ColeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van DiepenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret VanceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil CockwellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Bob WieringaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rheo BouchardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard DwornikiewiczSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert G. ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Arie Voskamp

Brian VoskampAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ilze Abolins

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Landmark

David SeedCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant landowner

Ken TovellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Meat A Chick Inc.

Robert LaplanteAgent
1 appearance
Ronald F. CazaCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Medallion Holsteins Ltd.

Jay CarterAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Martin Van Geffen

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Peter Wang

Denis WangAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Ruth McFeeters

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Barbara PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Edward CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernest PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic SauroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Andy Klemencic, Stan Klemencic and 818743 Ontario Ltd.

Mark KlemencicAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Eric Denotter and Russell W. Rogers

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, except Mr. & Mrs. Gauthier

Alan MacKinnonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Georgina May and Rosalind May Loffredo

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Pat and Ann Hutchinson

T. HutchinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Ramsay et al.

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Thames Bend Farms Ltd.

Rosemary SteinAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

James EllisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant, the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant the Township of Longueuil

Michael A. ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

for The Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kawartha Lakes

R. J. SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kingston

Jim EnglishAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Cam MilneAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario

Steven MclnnisAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Guy CormierAgent
2 appearances
Jim CaldwellAgent
2 appearances
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Richard TannerAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Southwest Middlesex and the Engineer's Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
2 appearances
D. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Independent Poultry Processors

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Potato Board

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance
Doug GreenAgent
1 appearance
Jean Pierre (Jay) BarbeauAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
JoAnn CraneAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance
Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance
Martin KieferAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited

P. Donald RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Tay Valley Township

Kathy Coulthart-DeweyAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of London

Don SimpsonAgent
1 appearance
Phillip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the County of Brant

Valerie M'GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Dunnville

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Kingsville

Bruce D. CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of North Perth

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Caledonia

Philip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Ekfrid

John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Michael DeVosAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Hay

Kimberly EvansCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Mariposa

Steve KarpazisAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Mariposa

Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Murray

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Peter Bryan-PulhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norwich

John KuntzeAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent, the Township of Russell

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Sullivan

David GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Wainfleet

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BradleyAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Caledon

Nadia KoltunCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket and the Town of East Gwillimbury

Susan PlamondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of New Tecumseth

William D. TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Brethour

Dorothy WhiteAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Caledonia

David ShelleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Clearview

Don McNaltyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of King

Josie MateraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Leeds and Thousand Islands

John A. TrudgenAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Jeffery, appellant

Murray JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Van Moorsel Farms Ltd.

Izaak de RijckeCounsel
1 appearance

Lutheran Church, Cemetery Board

Elmer GordnerAgent
1 appearance

Mayor, Municipality of West Perth

John VanBakelAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 17 appellants

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Barry RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Bart DerbisAgent
1 appearance
Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Peter EdisburyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of assessed owners Keith West, Dale McFeeters and Seldon Parker (Tampa Farms), John Yeomans

William TurvilleAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Dale and Linda Kramer, assessed owners

James RailtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of D. Lassaline, assessed landowner

Charlie LassalineAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Gary Beach, assessed landowner

Al FrasierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and several other appellants

Jack DeleplanqueSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Joan Dann, assessed owner

Christopher DannAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Larry Lampman, assessed owner

Ronald J. LampmanAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Mr. Haines

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Capri Realties Ltd.

Germain TessierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Hallstead Farms Limited

Gerald NewellAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Ruth McFeeters

Dale McFeetersAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicant, Moran’s Farm Supplies Ltd.

Mark BarrangerAgent
1 appearance
Pat MoranAgent
1 appearance
Tim MoranAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality

Janisse ZimmermanAgent
1 appearance
Patrick HaggittAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Retail Farm Equipment Dealers Association (ORFEDA)

Beverley LeavittAgent
1 appearance
Doug ArnottAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Wholesale Farm Equipment Association (OWFEA)

Erik SkjavelandAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent

Garth NoeckerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IllnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AGRICORP

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, New Holland Canada Ltd.

Rory ChisholmAgent
1 appearance
Roy BarronAgent
1 appearance
Simon WilsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Goderich

Andrew McBrideAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent the Corporation of the Township of Stanley

Rob WaltonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Haldimand

Robert HeilAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Lincoln

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Ken SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Town of Pelham

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Adelaide

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of East Wawanosh

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance
Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Fullarton

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Malahide

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Moore

Ron KerrAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of South-West Oxford

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Turnberry

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

Bryan WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Bosanquet

Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Laurie CoxAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of West Carleton

Brian CarryAgent
1 appearance
Glen GordonAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

Ontario Ministry of Transportation

Karen WilsonAgent
2 appearances

party

David O'NeillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald FournieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russell EyreSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the appeal

Bruce GowlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel LenartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ewen MacNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley A. McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance

President, Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP)

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Stanley, assessed owner

Jack ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing D. & K. Loucks, M. & K. Dimitrick, W. & B. Reid, V. & S. Chanyi, G. DeWit, T. Buys, R. Zweers, W. Zweers, S Fielder & C. Agnew, M. Leal, R. & L. Vanbesien, P. Reid, R. Tipping, J. Woulters, T. Moonen and M. Mitchell.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing Keith Lewis

John FildawAgent
1 appearance

representing Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner 15 Charles St.

Allen BuddenAgent
1 appearance

representing R.J.Burnside & Associates Ltd. (the "Engineer")

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

respondent to the motion

Harry McBrideSelf-represented
1 appearance

Road Superintendent

Dave HartleyAgent
1 appearance

solicitor for the respondent, the Town of Hawkesbury

J. J. Edmond WoodsCounsel
1 appearance

solicitor for William Easton

Phillip MorrisseyCounsel
1 appearance

spokesperson for the appellant

Lane GardnerAgent
1 appearance

Tampa Bay Farms, assessed landowner

Terry ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

to the respondent, the Township of Longueuil

Michael ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

unknown

Henry BosAgent
1 appearance

witness

Keith BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance

118

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.1

cases/mo

OAFRAAT118(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 3 of 6 (118 cases)