Who is Andrew Osyany?

Andrew Osyany is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Andrew Osyany sit on?

Andrew Osyany sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Andrew Osyany decide?

Andrew Osyany's most common areas include Administrative Law (114 decisions), Other Tribunals (107 decisions), Environmental Law (43 decisions). Andrew Osyany has handled 118 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has Andrew Osyany made?

Andrew Osyany has 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004.

Who frequently appears before Andrew Osyany?

Representatives who frequently appear before Andrew Osyany include Husseinali Shivji, Evelyn Hambly, William Cryderman.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Andrew Osyany — Vice-Chair

Corporate/Commercial Law

Andrew Osyany

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1995

118

cases · 10 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 53Vice Chair· 44Vice Chair· 10Vice Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-Chair· 3Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 31, 1999

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; private facility not incorporated into municipal works, precluding statutory allowance.

The appellants appealed the assessments in an amended engineer's report for a municipal drain, arguing that their existing private drainage facility should have been incorporated into the design and that they should receive an allowance under section 31 of the Drainage Act.

They also contested the cut-off benefit assessed to their properties.

The Tribunal held that the appeal was restricted to assessment matters and declined to treat it as a rehearing to alter the drain's design.

The Tribunal found that section 31 allowances were inapplicable because the private facility was not incorporated into the municipal works, and upheld the engineer's cut-off benefit assessments as a proper exercise of discretion.

Hayter Drain (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 22

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 12, 1999

Appeals regarding municipal drain modifications, crop damage allowances, and assessments dismissed.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Johnston Drain, seeking a modification to divert the upper portion of the watershed to the north, increased allowances for crop damage, and changes to the assessments.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the proposed northern diversion offered no cost or design advantage over the engineer's proposed route.

The Tribunal also upheld the crop damage allowance of $600 per acre and the assessments as fair and reasonable, though it ordered the engineer to amend the report to include detailed assessment calculations.

Johnston Drain (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 21

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 30, 1999

Tribunal recalculates crop insurance payout, finding farmer should not be penalized for minimizing losses.

The appellant farmer appealed a crop insurance claim adjustment by the respondent regarding 16 acres of corn damaged by frost and drought.

The respondent argued the tribunal lacked jurisdiction as the dispute involved policy and contract terms.

The tribunal found it had jurisdiction because the dispute concerned the assessment of loss, not contract changes.

The tribunal held that the respondent failed to explain all harvesting options to the appellant and that the appellant should not be penalized for attempting to minimize his losses by harvesting the damaged crop as silage.

The tribunal recalculated the claim payout, awarding the appellant the difference between the guaranteed production and the salvage value.

Horne v. Agricorp, 1999 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 11, 1999

Crop insurance appeal denied; area-based yield simulation correctly applied despite individual farm losses.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's calculation of their claims under the Crop Insurance Plan for Forage for the 1997 and 1998 crop years.

The appellants argued that the area-based yield simulation model did not accurately reflect their individual farm losses due to drought.

The Tribunal found that AGRICORP had correctly applied the area-based plan and its computer simulation model in accordance with the coverage purchased, and that the appellants were treated no differently than other insureds.

The appeal was denied.

Brazeau et al. v Agricorp, 1999 ONAFRAAT 11

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 21, 1999

Procedural directions issued following a pre-hearing conference in a chicken production quota appeal.

A pre-hearing conference was held to set out procedures for an appeal by 652024 Ontario Inc. (John Vanderzanden) against a decision of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario regarding alleged production and marketing of chicken without quota.

The Tribunal issued procedural directions concerning hearing dates, witnesses, documentary production, and legal representation.

Olszowka Poultry Inc. v. Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 1999 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 20, 1999

Tribunal approved amendments to drainage works by-law to include additional landowner-funded work.

The Township of Middlesex Centre applied to the Tribunal for a modification to By-Law No. 98-074 concerning the Taylor Drainage Works.

Three landowners requested additional work affecting only their properties and agreed to pay the total cost.

The Tribunal used its authority under section 51 of the Drainage Act to approve the requested amendments to the by-law, subject to terms including notice to affected parties and a 14-day appeal period.

Taylor Drainage Works (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 9, 1999

Appeal regarding municipal drain location dismissed, but assessment schedule amended to reflect greater benefit proportion.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Loach Municipal Drain, arguing that the drain should be relocated and their assessment reduced.

The Tribunal found that the proposed location of the drain was appropriate and dismissed the appeal regarding the location.

However, the Tribunal amended the assessment schedule, determining that a ratio of approximately 75% benefit and 25% outlet was more appropriate than the 50:50 ratio set by the Court of Revision.

Frank and Jean Scott v. Township of Norwich, 1999 ONAFRAAT 7

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 2, 1999

Application granted permitting the municipality to appoint an engineer to vary a drainage assessment.

The City of Sarnia applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal under section 76 of the Drainage Act for permission to appoint an engineer to procure a report to vary the assessment for the Bird Drain.

The Tribunal considered the submissions and noted that the Township had no objections.

The Tribunal granted the application, permitting the City to appoint an engineer to vary the assessment.

No costs were ordered.

Bird Drain (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 5, 1999

Drainage assessment appealed; Tribunal ordered revised schedule weighting channel maintenance 60% to outlet and 40% to benefit.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the assessment for the South Hutchinson Municipal Drain.

The engineer's report proposed cleaning out and extending the drain, with assessments divided between benefit and outlet.

The appellants argued their benefit assessment was disproportionately high compared to upstream landowners.

The Tribunal found that the primary purpose of the main drain was to provide an outlet for the entire watershed rather than direct benefit to abutting landowners.

The Tribunal ordered the engineer to prepare a new schedule of assessment using a ratio of 40% benefit and 60% outlet for channel maintenance.

South Hutchinson Municipal Drain (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 5

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 19, 1999

Tribunal approved modifications to a drainage by-law following construction changes, subject to landowner notification.

The Township of Tilbury North applied to the Ontario Drainage Tribunal to modify By-law No. 36-97 concerning the Brissette Drain and Pump.

During construction, several changes were made to the drainage system, including enclosing a portion of the open drain, modifying the forcemain, and relocating a sewer, resulting in a 32% cost increase.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments under sections 51 and 58 of the Drainage Act, subject to the Township notifying affected landowners and allowing a 14-day appeal period.

Brissette Drain and Pump (Re), 1999 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 24, 1998

Engineer's report for municipal drain referred back for re-working of assessments to comply with statutory and common law principles.

Several landowners appealed the decision of the Court of Revision confirming the assessments in the July 1998 engineer's report for the proposed Hayter Municipal Drain.

The appellants argued that the assessments were unfair, as the drain primarily benefited the agricultural property of the petitioning landowner.

The Tribunal found that the engineer's method of calculating the assessments did not comply with the Drainage Act or common law principles regarding surface water and cut-off benefits.

The Tribunal ordered the report referred back to the engineer to re-work the assessments in accordance with the principles set out in its decision, and amended the report's provisions regarding maintenance.

Hayter Municipal Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 50

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 5, 1998

Appeals against engineer's report and assessments for proposed drainage works dismissed.

Several ratepayers appealed an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision regarding the proposed Scotchmer Drain under the Drainage Act.

The appellants argued that the proposed drainage works primarily benefited only two properties and that the assessments were unfair.

The Tribunal found that the existing drainage facilities were failing, causing erosion and flooding, and that the proposed project was necessary and cost beneficial.

The Tribunal also concluded that the assessments were appropriate, as the project provided a legal outlet for drainage water from all assessed properties.

The appeals were dismissed, and the engineer's report was confirmed with minor modifications.

Scotchmer Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 45

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 23, 1998

Drainage assessment report referred back to engineer to adjust benefit-to-outlet ratio for equitable treatment.

The appellants appealed the decision of the Court of Revision confirming the assessments in an engineer's report for the Cranberry Lake Drain.

The Tribunal found that the main purpose of the proposed work was to provide an outlet for upstream lands rather than direct benefit to adjacent lands.

The Tribunal concluded that the benefit-to-outlet ratio should be adjusted to 40% benefit and 60% outlet to ensure equitable treatment of similarly situated properties.

The report was referred back to the engineer for reconsideration of the assessments in accordance with the Tribunal's directions.

Cranberry Lake Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 44

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 5, 1998

Appeal of municipal drain engineer's report dismissed; routing and assessments upheld as reasonable.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report for a municipal drain, arguing that the drain should not cross his property and that his assessment was too high.

The Tribunal found that there was no practical alternative to routing the drain through the appellant's property.

The Tribunal also upheld the engineer's assessment methodology, finding it reasonable despite being unusual, though it ordered a minor correction to the assessment schedule.

The appeals were dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay a portion of the hearing costs due to his failure to participate in earlier stages of the process.

Peter Wang v. Township of Russell, 1998 ONAFRAAT 41

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 24, 1998

Appeal of municipal drain assessment dismissed; engineer's methodology found reasonable and consistent.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding assessments for the Jermyn Municipal Drain, requesting that all assessments for benefit and outlet be removed from her property and that no drain be installed.

The appellant argued that a portion of her land would never be cleared for agricultural purposes and should not be assessed for benefit.

The Tribunal found that the property would receive a benefit from the drain as it provides positive control of water flow and potential for increased productive land.

The Tribunal concluded that the engineer used proper methodology and the appellant was treated fairly in relation to other landowners.

The appeal was dismissed.

Basilla Grubbe v. Township of Turnberry, 1998 ONAFRAAT 39

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 3, 1998

Drainage assessment and allowances upheld; drain profile modified by agreement to reduce excavation depth.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Keenan Municipal Drain, arguing that he received no benefit from the drain, that the allowances for right-of-way and potential damages were inadequate, and that he wished to preserve his property as a wetland.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding assessments and allowances, finding them fair and reasonable, and noted that the appellant's property would benefit from better conducting of surface water.

However, based on an agreement reached between the parties, the Tribunal ordered a modification to the drain's grade profile to decrease the depth of excavation on the appellant's land.

No costs were awarded.

John Pirie v. Town of Pelham, 1998 ONAFRAAT 36

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 28, 1998

Tribunal revokes 1987 order for drainage pump installation due to landowner opposition and lack of necessity.

The City of Port Colborne applied to rescind a 1987 Tribunal order that required the installation of a low lift pumping station on the Point Abino Drain.

Both the City and the Town of Fort Erie supported abandoning the project, and a survey of affected landowners revealed overwhelming opposition to the installation.

The Tribunal granted the motion and revoked the 1987 order, finding that the passage of time without significant flooding problems indicated the pump was no longer necessary.

The Tribunal ordered that the costs incurred to date be divided between the municipalities and assessed against the landowners in the drainage area.

Point Albino Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 28

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 2, 1998

Drainage construction appeal dismissed but monetary compensation ordered for unauthorized changes benefiting neighbour.

The appellants appealed the quality of construction of a municipal drain, arguing it deviated from the Engineer's Report.

The Township applied to amend the by-law to reflect the 'as-built' conditions.

During construction, changes were made to water retention terraces without the appellants' knowledge or the Engineer's prior approval, benefiting a neighbouring landowner while placing the burden of water retention entirely on the appellants.

The Tribunal found the drain functioned satisfactorily and declined to order reconstruction.

However, the Tribunal ordered monetary adjustments to compensate the appellants for the unfair process and the neighbouring landowner's unearned benefits, and approved the addendum to the Engineer's Report.

Edward and Brenda Czerniawski v. Township of East Zorra-Tavistock, 1998 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 24, 1998

Tribunal restored engineer's original drainage assessments, revoking Court of Revision's modification.

Several landowners appealed a Court of Revision decision regarding the Easton Drain assessments under the Drainage Act.

The engineer had originally apportioned the costs of the drain repair and improvement equally between benefit to adjacent lands and outlet for upstream landowners.

The Court of Revision had reduced the assessment for one landowner, shifting the cost to upstream owners.

The Tribunal found the engineer's original assessments were fair and equitable given the watershed's topography, revoked the Court of Revision's decision, and restored the engineer's original assessment schedule.

David & Margaret Vance et al. v. Township of Blandford-Blenheim, 1998 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 21, 1998

Crop insurance appeal dismissed as claim settlement for hail damage was correctly calculated under the policy.

The appellant appealed the decision of AGRICORP concerning the adjustment of loss under the Crop Insurance Plan for Apples following hail damage to his orchard.

The appellant argued that the plan was unfair, complex, and provided inadequate protection, noting that his payout was only 51% of the damage.

The Tribunal found that AGRICORP had calculated the claim settlement in accordance with the policy purchased by the appellant.

As the Tribunal only has authority to adjust the amount of settlement and the calculation was correct under the contract, the appeal was dismissed, though the Tribunal recommended AGRICORP review and improve the plan.

Van Diepen v. Agricrop, 1998 ONAFRAAT 17

Page 4 of 6 (118 cases)

advocate for Mr. Mervin Martin

Clifford StephensAgent
1 appearance

advocate for the appellant

Harry DenHaanAgent
1 appearance

agent for Lois Hayter

Glenn HayterAgent
1 appearance

agent for Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner

Allan ButtonAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Alec KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Al YagminasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anna HaasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne CoyneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carl HillebrechtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caroline DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Catherine GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charles FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris BrazeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dan FroeseSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darlene BowenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave ForsythSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denton MeiklejohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SpencerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dr. Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DownSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ethel BarkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Burt HodginsSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Robert AchesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
William EastonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Basilla GrubbeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

William CrydermanSelf-represented
2 appearances

appellants

Edward AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants in person

John WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph FarnsworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joyce ShackSelf-represented
1 appearance
W. J. MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris McArthurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
John McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
3 appearances
Ann WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Murray BeachSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gerry BakerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reg CableSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andy DeverellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Frank WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Serge PharandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Shawn PowellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Wes CraigSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian FumertonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Linda FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daryl LoucksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marjorie CampbellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jim FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steve ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vick HarrisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne FerrisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Adrian BrouwerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 14 Charles St.

Gerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 19 Charles St.

Carl GillespieSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 26 Charles St.

Gerry DeWittSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Allan HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg HoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Albertine CroftSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne VanderbrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard KordyjakaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce Van KemenadeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chester DannSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris ToeppSelf-represented
1 appearance
John OosterveldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Josh FullanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louise LordSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maurice VanhouckeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray LampmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard BeauchampSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rodney McCabeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen ScotchmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stewart McPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvester. PhilipsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer

Dean WebbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard AbrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisting the appellant

Marielle KlijnAgent
1 appearance

Ausauble Bayfield Conservation Authority

Ryan HernAgent
1 appearance

counsel, to Mrs. Beverley Misener

Ralph BenedictCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Callum SheddenCounsel
1 appearance
D. GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Norman Peel, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Sunnybrook Farms

Ron FolkesCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the applicant, the Director of Regulatory Compliance

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Camden

J. WickettCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Mayor, on behalf of the Municipal Council, Township of Enniskillen

Jim BurnsAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Reeve, Township of Brethour

Tom GoddardAgent
1 appearance

downstream landowner

Catherine KwarciakSelf-represented
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

E. Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared the engineer's report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Bradford West Gwillimbury and Township of King

Art JanseAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, for the Municipality of Thames Centre

Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for 1060008 Ontario Ltd.

Doug VollmershausenAgent
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
4 appearances
Judith Kay-SchecterAgent
2 appearances
Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Jim ZavitzAgent
2 appearances
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
Roger GeysensAgent
1 appearance

for Carl Hillebrecht, appellant

Andy McBrideAgent
1 appearance

for Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel BaigCounsel
1 appearance

for Cowan Farm Drainage, respondent

Mike CowanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Evelyn Cleland, Murray Teel, Colin Campbell and W. Christopher Dale

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Fernand Gauthier

Garnet McDiarmidAgent
1 appearance

for Florence McCarl

Jack McCarlAgent
1 appearance

for Francesco and Rosetta Iannialice, appellants

Jack DavisAgent
1 appearance

for Gary Beach, appellant

Al FraserAgent
2 appearances

for George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for Green Lane Environmental, appellant

Anne HiscockAgent
1 appearance
Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Brian BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don KolkeaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WestSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fernand GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. MullerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John SoenenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mervin MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick WallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray SwaimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Willey McLellanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for K. Smart Associates Ltd.

Ken SmartAgent
2 appearances

for Lana Hicks and George Boothe, assessed owners

Bob CarrierAgent
1 appearance

for Margaret Munro

Colin StillCounsel
1 appearance

for Maria Janzen

Suzanna JanzenAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olde York Potato Chips

Donald ShortCounsel
1 appearance
William GeorgesCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter VanKruistum, appellant

Bradley StoneCounsel
1 appearance

for R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for Robert and David Groszeibl, Joseph and Elizabeth Groszeibl, and Mr. William Van Vliet

Christopher WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Schnurr's Country Market Ltd.

Dave SchnurrAgent
1 appearance

for several appellants

Steven RennerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R. Graham, F.&R. Graham, J.&R. Graham, Oakwood Agromart Ltd., 1035485 Ontario Ltd., G. Butterworth et al., J. Everson, J. Garland, J.&J. Hickson and J. Hickson

William TurvilleCounsel
2 appearances

for Thames Valley District School Board

Charles M. AttardAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Peter KlijnSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clayton WattersAgent
1 appearance
Darlene BowenAgent
1 appearance
Donald HorneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Edwin HornerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim ColeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van DiepenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret VanceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil CockwellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Bob WieringaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rheo BouchardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard DwornikiewiczSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert G. ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Arie Voskamp

Brian VoskampAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ilze Abolins

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Landmark

David SeedCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant landowner

Ken TovellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Meat A Chick Inc.

Robert LaplanteAgent
1 appearance
Ronald F. CazaCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Medallion Holsteins Ltd.

Jay CarterAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Martin Van Geffen

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Peter Wang

Denis WangAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Ruth McFeeters

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Barbara PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Edward CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernest PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic SauroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Andy Klemencic, Stan Klemencic and 818743 Ontario Ltd.

Mark KlemencicAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Eric Denotter and Russell W. Rogers

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, except Mr. & Mrs. Gauthier

Alan MacKinnonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Georgina May and Rosalind May Loffredo

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Pat and Ann Hutchinson

T. HutchinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Ramsay et al.

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Thames Bend Farms Ltd.

Rosemary SteinAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

James EllisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant, the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant the Township of Longueuil

Michael A. ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

for The Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kawartha Lakes

R. J. SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kingston

Jim EnglishAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Cam MilneAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario

Steven MclnnisAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Guy CormierAgent
2 appearances
Jim CaldwellAgent
2 appearances
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Richard TannerAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Southwest Middlesex and the Engineer's Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
2 appearances
D. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Independent Poultry Processors

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Potato Board

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance
Doug GreenAgent
1 appearance
Jean Pierre (Jay) BarbeauAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
JoAnn CraneAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance
Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance
Martin KieferAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited

P. Donald RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Tay Valley Township

Kathy Coulthart-DeweyAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of London

Don SimpsonAgent
1 appearance
Phillip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the County of Brant

Valerie M'GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Dunnville

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Kingsville

Bruce D. CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of North Perth

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Caledonia

Philip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Ekfrid

John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Michael DeVosAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Hay

Kimberly EvansCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Mariposa

Steve KarpazisAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Mariposa

Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Murray

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Peter Bryan-PulhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norwich

John KuntzeAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent, the Township of Russell

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Sullivan

David GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Wainfleet

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BradleyAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Caledon

Nadia KoltunCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket and the Town of East Gwillimbury

Susan PlamondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of New Tecumseth

William D. TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Brethour

Dorothy WhiteAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Caledonia

David ShelleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Clearview

Don McNaltyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of King

Josie MateraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Leeds and Thousand Islands

John A. TrudgenAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Jeffery, appellant

Murray JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Van Moorsel Farms Ltd.

Izaak de RijckeCounsel
1 appearance

Lutheran Church, Cemetery Board

Elmer GordnerAgent
1 appearance

Mayor, Municipality of West Perth

John VanBakelAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 17 appellants

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Barry RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Bart DerbisAgent
1 appearance
Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Peter EdisburyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of assessed owners Keith West, Dale McFeeters and Seldon Parker (Tampa Farms), John Yeomans

William TurvilleAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Dale and Linda Kramer, assessed owners

James RailtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of D. Lassaline, assessed landowner

Charlie LassalineAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Gary Beach, assessed landowner

Al FrasierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and several other appellants

Jack DeleplanqueSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Joan Dann, assessed owner

Christopher DannAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Larry Lampman, assessed owner

Ronald J. LampmanAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Mr. Haines

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Capri Realties Ltd.

Germain TessierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Hallstead Farms Limited

Gerald NewellAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Ruth McFeeters

Dale McFeetersAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicant, Moran’s Farm Supplies Ltd.

Mark BarrangerAgent
1 appearance
Pat MoranAgent
1 appearance
Tim MoranAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality

Janisse ZimmermanAgent
1 appearance
Patrick HaggittAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Retail Farm Equipment Dealers Association (ORFEDA)

Beverley LeavittAgent
1 appearance
Doug ArnottAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Wholesale Farm Equipment Association (OWFEA)

Erik SkjavelandAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent

Garth NoeckerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IllnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AGRICORP

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, New Holland Canada Ltd.

Rory ChisholmAgent
1 appearance
Roy BarronAgent
1 appearance
Simon WilsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Goderich

Andrew McBrideAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent the Corporation of the Township of Stanley

Rob WaltonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Haldimand

Robert HeilAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Lincoln

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Ken SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Town of Pelham

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Adelaide

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of East Wawanosh

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance
Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Fullarton

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Malahide

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Moore

Ron KerrAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of South-West Oxford

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Turnberry

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

Bryan WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Bosanquet

Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Laurie CoxAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of West Carleton

Brian CarryAgent
1 appearance
Glen GordonAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

Ontario Ministry of Transportation

Karen WilsonAgent
2 appearances

party

David O'NeillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald FournieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russell EyreSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the appeal

Bruce GowlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel LenartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ewen MacNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley A. McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance

President, Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP)

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Stanley, assessed owner

Jack ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing D. & K. Loucks, M. & K. Dimitrick, W. & B. Reid, V. & S. Chanyi, G. DeWit, T. Buys, R. Zweers, W. Zweers, S Fielder & C. Agnew, M. Leal, R. & L. Vanbesien, P. Reid, R. Tipping, J. Woulters, T. Moonen and M. Mitchell.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing Keith Lewis

John FildawAgent
1 appearance

representing Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner 15 Charles St.

Allen BuddenAgent
1 appearance

representing R.J.Burnside & Associates Ltd. (the "Engineer")

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

respondent to the motion

Harry McBrideSelf-represented
1 appearance

Road Superintendent

Dave HartleyAgent
1 appearance

solicitor for the respondent, the Town of Hawkesbury

J. J. Edmond WoodsCounsel
1 appearance

solicitor for William Easton

Phillip MorrisseyCounsel
1 appearance

spokesperson for the appellant

Lane GardnerAgent
1 appearance

Tampa Bay Farms, assessed landowner

Terry ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

to the respondent, the Township of Longueuil

Michael ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

unknown

Henry BosAgent
1 appearance

witness

Keith BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance

118

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.1

cases/mo

OAFRAAT118(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 4 of 6 (118 cases)