Who is Andrew Osyany?

Andrew Osyany is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Andrew Osyany sit on?

Andrew Osyany sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Andrew Osyany decide?

Andrew Osyany's most common areas include Administrative Law (114 decisions), Other Tribunals (107 decisions), Environmental Law (43 decisions). Andrew Osyany has handled 118 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has Andrew Osyany made?

Andrew Osyany has 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004.

Who frequently appears before Andrew Osyany?

Representatives who frequently appear before Andrew Osyany include Husseinali Shivji, Evelyn Hambly, William Cryderman.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Andrew Osyany — Vice-Chair

Corporate/Commercial Law

Andrew Osyany

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1995

118

cases · 10 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 53Vice Chair· 44Vice Chair· 10Vice Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-Chair· 3Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 16, 1998

Application to rescind drainage order adjourned pending written submissions from affected landowners.

The City of Port Colborne applied to the Tribunal to rescind a 1987 order requiring the installation of a low lift pumping station on the Point Abino Drain.

The City and the Town of Fort Erie did not wish to proceed with the work and requested that costs to date be assessed pro rata.

The Tribunal found it lacked sufficient information to make a decision and ordered the City to circulate a notice to all affected landowners inviting written submissions on the engineer's report and the payment of costs.

Point Albino Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 2, 1998

Tribunal approved requested amendments to a municipal drainage by-law to stabilize ditch banks in their present location.

The Township of Adelaide applied to the Tribunal to modify a municipal by-law concerning the Sutherland Drain, based on a revised engineer's report requested by a ratepayer.

The proposed modification involved repairing the drain and stabilizing the banks in their present location rather than moving the drain bank.

The Tribunal approved the requested amendments to the by-law on terms, directing the engineer to amend the plan and profile and the Township to notify affected owners.

Sutherland Drain (Re), 1998 ONAFRAAT 14

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 30, 1998

Appeal dismissed; producer found to have marketed unreported chicken and five-fold quota reduction penalty upheld.

The appellant, a registered chicken producer, appealed a decision of the Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) finding that it had produced and marketed 7,567 kilograms of chicken without quota, failed to report chicks placed, and failed to pay license fees.

The CFO had imposed a penalty reducing the appellant's future crop quota by five times the amount of the unreported chicken and assessed levies of $933.37.

The Tribunal heard conflicting evidence regarding whether the appellant had shipped illegal chicken to an abattoir.

The Tribunal found the evidence of the abattoir's bookkeeper and the redirected payment cheques to be credible, concluding that the appellant did ship the unreported chicken.

Finding no mitigating circumstances, the Tribunal upheld the CFO's findings and the five-fold penalty, dismissing the appeal.

Meat a Chick Farm Inc. v Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 1998 ONAFRAAT 13

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 15, 1997

Tribunal restores engineer's drainage assessments and orders costs against appellants for pursuing unmeritorious appeal.

The appellants appealed the assessments and allowances provided by the engineer for a municipal drain, arguing their lands did not contribute runoff to the drain and that the assessments were excessive.

The Court of Revision had slightly reduced their assessments.

The Tribunal found that the appellants' lands did contribute to the drain and that the engineer's calculations were appropriate.

The Tribunal set aside the Court of Revision's decision, restored the engineer's original assessments, and ordered the appellants to pay costs for pursuing an appeal without reasonably informing themselves of the assessment principles.

Lembke Municipal Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 54

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 2, 1997

Tribunal approved adding $1,037.73 to drainage works levy to fix inadvertently diverted spring water.

The Township of Proton applied to the Tribunal to modify By-Law 12-1996 regarding the Samborsky Drainage Works.

Construction of the municipal drain inadvertently diverted water from a private spring, cutting off the water supply to a neighbouring trout pond.

The Township deepened an existing private drain to restore the flow at a cost of $1,037.73.

The Tribunal ordered that this cost be added to the final levy for the drainage works and clarified that the deepened drain remains private, with no future maintenance obligation for the municipality.

Sambrosky Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 53

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 21, 1997

Application to reconsider a 1996 drainage decision denied for delay and lack of new evidence.

Three assessed ratepayers applied to the Tribunal to reconsider its July 2, 1996 decision regarding the W.W. Turner Pumping Works on the Whitebread Tap Drain.

The applicants argued that evidence was misunderstood and sought to present new evidence, including a 1997 cost estimate for replacing a tunnel.

The Tribunal applied its four-part test for rehearings, considering the integrity of the process, the interest in correct decisions, finality, and costs.

Finding that the request was made over a year late and failed to provide new information unavailable at the original hearing, the Tribunal denied the request for reconsideration.

W. W. Turner Pumping Works on the Whiteboard Tap Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 50

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 18, 1997

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; benefit assessment for bank stabilization and rip-rap found fair.

The appellant appealed his assessment under the Drainage Act for work on the Mud Creek and Sutherland Drain.

He argued that the $8,350 assessed against his property as a benefit for bank stabilization and rip-rap installation should instead be charged to upstream owners as an injuring liability, claiming the erosion was caused by increased water flow from upstream tile drainage.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the benefit assessment was fair and that the appellant received a special benefit from the specific work requested to prevent land loss.

Martin Van Geffen v. Township of Adelaide, 1997 ONAFRAAT 49

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 31, 1997

Drainage report referred back for redesign due to channel erosion; hearing costs excluded from project.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Coultis Drain under the Drainage Act.

At the hearing, the engineer who prepared the report advised that the channel had significantly eroded since the design was completed, rendering the proposed work inadequate and requiring a complete redesign with substantially higher costs.

The Tribunal ordered the report referred back to an engineer for further consideration.

Because the engineers for both sides failed to communicate these known issues in a timely manner prior to the hearing, the Tribunal ordered that the costs of the hearing not be added to the cost of the drainage works, and made no order as to costs.

Coultis Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 48

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 31, 1997

Township granted permission to appoint an engineer to vary drainage assessment.

The Township of Euphemia applied under section 76 of the Drainage Act for permission to appoint an engineer to procure a report to vary the assessment for the Bolton Drain.

The Township of Mosa confirmed it had no objections.

The Tribunal granted the application and permitted the appointment of an engineer.

Bolton Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 47

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 25, 1997

Application to modify drainage report to enclose drain in pipe granted with costs to Road Authority.

The Township of Orford applied to modify an engineer's report regarding the Grant Drain to enclose a 65-metre extension in a pipe due to potential erosion of sandy soils.

The Road Authority agreed to assume the additional costs.

The Tribunal granted the application under section 51 of the Drainage Act, ordering the engineer to prepare new specifications and the Township to modify the bylaw, subject to a 14-day appeal period for affected landowners.

Grant Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 46

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 17, 1997

Appeals from engineer's report on municipal drain largely dismissed; assessment division and proposed works upheld.

Several assessed landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding a municipal drain.

The appellants argued that the proposed drainage works were too extensive and that their assessments were disproportionate to the benefits received.

The Tribunal upheld the engineer's 50% benefit and 50% outlet assessment division, finding it fair and reasonable.

The Tribunal declined to eliminate the proposed pumping station but ordered minor modifications to the report, including the addition of a high-water alarm system and the removal of a specific culvert.

The appeals were largely dismissed.

Beaverdam Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 45

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 3, 1997

Appeals of engineer's report on municipal drain dismissed; expanded watershed and assessments confirmed despite methodological concerns.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report on the MacLaren Drain, challenging the expansion of the watershed boundary and the resulting assessments for repair and maintenance.

The appellants argued that their lands did not benefit from or contribute significantly to the drain, and that the municipality should bear costs for redirecting water.

The Tribunal found that the expanded watershed accurately reflected lands contributing water to the drain.

Although the Tribunal noted the engineer's methodology for calculating assessments and failing to provide Section 29 allowances was not in accordance with prevailing practices, it concluded the final assessments were within an appropriate range.

The appeals were dismissed, and the report was confirmed with minor typographical amendments.

MacLaren Municipal Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 43

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 2, 1997

Application to appoint an engineer to vary a drainage assessment granted.

The Township of Zone applied under section 76 of the Drainage Act for permission to appoint an engineer to procure a report to vary the assessment for the North Branch Butler Drain.

The Township of Euphemia did not object.

The Tribunal granted the application and ordered that each party bear its own costs.

North Branch Butler Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 42

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 29, 1997

Tribunal ruled AgriCorp may revise a final acreage report after filing and premium payment.

The appellants appealed a decision of AgriCorp concerning a crop insurance claim for corn.

As a preliminary matter, the parties asked the Tribunal to rule on whether AgriCorp had the legal authority to revise a final acreage report after it had been filed and the premium paid.

The Tribunal ruled that under Regulation 222, AgriCorp has a reasonable period of time to review and revise the final acreage report, subject to the insured's right to object.

Following this ruling, the appellants withdrew the balance of their appeal.

Wallace v. Agricorp, 1997 ONAFRAAT 39

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 19, 1997

Drainage assessment appeal dismissed; engineer's calculations found fair and appropriate.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision concerning the assessments for the Leach West Drain 1996.

The appellant argued that the assessment of approximately 50% of the costs to his property was too high, as the flooding on his land was caused by runoff from upstream properties.

The Tribunal found that the proposed drain would significantly reduce flooding and erosion on the appellant's property, providing a substantial benefit.

Finding no errors in the engineer's calculations, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal and confirmed the assessments.

Richard Dwornikiewicz v. Township of Norwich, 1997 ONAFRAAT 5

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 3, 1997

Drainage assessment reduced where municipality's engineer failed to adequately explain benefit assessment methodology.

The appellants appealed the assessment for a proposed municipal drain under the Drainage Act.

They argued they were entitled to an allowance for an existing drain, that future maintenance costs for a culvert were improperly apportioned, and that their benefit assessment was incorrect.

The Tribunal dismissed the claims regarding the allowance and maintenance apportionment.

However, finding the engineer's explanation of the benefit assessment methodology inadequate, the Tribunal reduced the appellants' benefit assessment by $500 and increased the municipality's assessment by the same amount.

Willford Road Municipal Drain (Re), 1997 ONAFRAAT 3

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 9, 1996

Municipality ordered to adopt engineer's drainage report after irresponsibly deferring decision without expert basis.

The appellant appealed under section 45(2) of the Drainage Act from the municipal council's failure to adopt an engineer's report for a proposed petition drain.

The council had refused to adopt the report, arguing that the area requiring drainage was smaller than determined by the engineer and that the report was flawed regarding water flow.

The Tribunal found no flaws in the engineer's report, noting that the engineer correctly designed the drain for the entire watershed area.

The Tribunal ordered the council to adopt the report and directed the municipality to pay the appellant's costs, finding that the council had acted irresponsibly by deferring the decision without seeking alternative expert opinions.

Ruth McFeeters v. Township of Mariposa, 1996 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 3, 1996

Engineer's account for municipal drain project confirmed despite finding of shared responsibility for project's impracticality.

The Township of Longueuil applied to the Ontario Drainage Tribunal to review the account of McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited for work on the Mill Creek Municipal Drain.

The Township argued that the engineer should have advised earlier that the project was impractical under section 40 of the Drainage Act and that fees incurred after that point should not be paid.

The Tribunal extended the time for filing the application under section 100 of the Act.

The Tribunal found deficiencies in the engineer's work but concluded that the responsibility was shared between the engineer, the municipal council, and the ratepayers.

The Tribunal confirmed the engineer's accounts up to the April 17, 1996 hearing and ordered the engineer to provide all original information to the Township.

Township of Longueuil v. McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited, 1996 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 25, 1996

Municipality ordered to pay $4,000 allowance for failing to construct municipal drain to report specifications.

The appellant appealed under section 64 of the Drainage Act, claiming the Nelson Street Outlet Municipal Drain was constructed in the wrong location.

The Tribunal found that the drain was not constructed to the specifications of the engineer's report due to unanticipated construction difficulties.

However, because there was little immediate advantage to relocating the drain, the Tribunal ordered the respondent municipality to pay the appellant an allowance of $4,000 for future reconstruction costs, allowing the appellant to relocate the drain at its convenience.

Nelson Street Outlet Municipal Drain (Re), 1996 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 2, 1996

Appeal of municipal drain engineer's report dismissed; appellant's alternative proposal lacked sufficient investigation.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report for the Norman Heights Municipal Drain, arguing that the proposed drainage works should be modified, the allowances were insufficient, and the assessments were improper.

The appellant proposed a low-cost alternative using an existing tile drainage system.

The Ontario Drainage Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding that the appellant's alternative lacked sufficient investigation into the outlet's suitability, and that the engineer's allowances and assessments were reasonable and unbiased.

Costs of $2,000 were awarded to the respondent municipality.

Norman Heights Municipal Drain (Re), 1996 ONAFRAAT 16

Page 5 of 6 (118 cases)

advocate for Mr. Mervin Martin

Clifford StephensAgent
1 appearance

advocate for the appellant

Harry DenHaanAgent
1 appearance

agent for Lois Hayter

Glenn HayterAgent
1 appearance

agent for Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner

Allan ButtonAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Alec KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Al YagminasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anna HaasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne CoyneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carl HillebrechtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caroline DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Catherine GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charles FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris BrazeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dan FroeseSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darlene BowenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave ForsythSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denton MeiklejohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SpencerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dr. Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DownSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ethel BarkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Burt HodginsSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Robert AchesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
William EastonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Basilla GrubbeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

William CrydermanSelf-represented
2 appearances

appellants

Edward AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants in person

John WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph FarnsworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joyce ShackSelf-represented
1 appearance
W. J. MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris McArthurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
John McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
3 appearances
Ann WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Murray BeachSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gerry BakerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reg CableSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andy DeverellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Frank WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Serge PharandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Shawn PowellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Wes CraigSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian FumertonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Linda FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daryl LoucksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marjorie CampbellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jim FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steve ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vick HarrisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne FerrisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Adrian BrouwerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 14 Charles St.

Gerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 19 Charles St.

Carl GillespieSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 26 Charles St.

Gerry DeWittSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Allan HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg HoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Albertine CroftSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne VanderbrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard KordyjakaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce Van KemenadeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chester DannSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris ToeppSelf-represented
1 appearance
John OosterveldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Josh FullanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louise LordSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maurice VanhouckeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray LampmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard BeauchampSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rodney McCabeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen ScotchmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stewart McPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvester. PhilipsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer

Dean WebbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard AbrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisting the appellant

Marielle KlijnAgent
1 appearance

Ausauble Bayfield Conservation Authority

Ryan HernAgent
1 appearance

counsel, to Mrs. Beverley Misener

Ralph BenedictCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Callum SheddenCounsel
1 appearance
D. GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Norman Peel, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Sunnybrook Farms

Ron FolkesCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the applicant, the Director of Regulatory Compliance

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Camden

J. WickettCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Mayor, on behalf of the Municipal Council, Township of Enniskillen

Jim BurnsAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Reeve, Township of Brethour

Tom GoddardAgent
1 appearance

downstream landowner

Catherine KwarciakSelf-represented
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

E. Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared the engineer's report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Bradford West Gwillimbury and Township of King

Art JanseAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, for the Municipality of Thames Centre

Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for 1060008 Ontario Ltd.

Doug VollmershausenAgent
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
4 appearances
Judith Kay-SchecterAgent
2 appearances
Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Jim ZavitzAgent
2 appearances
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
Roger GeysensAgent
1 appearance

for Carl Hillebrecht, appellant

Andy McBrideAgent
1 appearance

for Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel BaigCounsel
1 appearance

for Cowan Farm Drainage, respondent

Mike CowanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Evelyn Cleland, Murray Teel, Colin Campbell and W. Christopher Dale

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Fernand Gauthier

Garnet McDiarmidAgent
1 appearance

for Florence McCarl

Jack McCarlAgent
1 appearance

for Francesco and Rosetta Iannialice, appellants

Jack DavisAgent
1 appearance

for Gary Beach, appellant

Al FraserAgent
2 appearances

for George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for Green Lane Environmental, appellant

Anne HiscockAgent
1 appearance
Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Brian BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don KolkeaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WestSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fernand GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. MullerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John SoenenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mervin MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick WallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray SwaimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Willey McLellanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for K. Smart Associates Ltd.

Ken SmartAgent
2 appearances

for Lana Hicks and George Boothe, assessed owners

Bob CarrierAgent
1 appearance

for Margaret Munro

Colin StillCounsel
1 appearance

for Maria Janzen

Suzanna JanzenAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olde York Potato Chips

Donald ShortCounsel
1 appearance
William GeorgesCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter VanKruistum, appellant

Bradley StoneCounsel
1 appearance

for R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for Robert and David Groszeibl, Joseph and Elizabeth Groszeibl, and Mr. William Van Vliet

Christopher WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Schnurr's Country Market Ltd.

Dave SchnurrAgent
1 appearance

for several appellants

Steven RennerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R. Graham, F.&R. Graham, J.&R. Graham, Oakwood Agromart Ltd., 1035485 Ontario Ltd., G. Butterworth et al., J. Everson, J. Garland, J.&J. Hickson and J. Hickson

William TurvilleCounsel
2 appearances

for Thames Valley District School Board

Charles M. AttardAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Peter KlijnSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clayton WattersAgent
1 appearance
Darlene BowenAgent
1 appearance
Donald HorneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Edwin HornerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim ColeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van DiepenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret VanceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil CockwellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Bob WieringaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rheo BouchardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard DwornikiewiczSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert G. ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Arie Voskamp

Brian VoskampAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ilze Abolins

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Landmark

David SeedCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant landowner

Ken TovellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Meat A Chick Inc.

Robert LaplanteAgent
1 appearance
Ronald F. CazaCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Medallion Holsteins Ltd.

Jay CarterAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Martin Van Geffen

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Peter Wang

Denis WangAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Ruth McFeeters

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Barbara PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Edward CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernest PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic SauroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Andy Klemencic, Stan Klemencic and 818743 Ontario Ltd.

Mark KlemencicAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Eric Denotter and Russell W. Rogers

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, except Mr. & Mrs. Gauthier

Alan MacKinnonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Georgina May and Rosalind May Loffredo

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Pat and Ann Hutchinson

T. HutchinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Ramsay et al.

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Thames Bend Farms Ltd.

Rosemary SteinAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

James EllisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant, the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant the Township of Longueuil

Michael A. ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

for The Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kawartha Lakes

R. J. SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kingston

Jim EnglishAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Cam MilneAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario

Steven MclnnisAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Guy CormierAgent
2 appearances
Jim CaldwellAgent
2 appearances
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Richard TannerAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Southwest Middlesex and the Engineer's Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
2 appearances
D. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Independent Poultry Processors

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Potato Board

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance
Doug GreenAgent
1 appearance
Jean Pierre (Jay) BarbeauAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
JoAnn CraneAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance
Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance
Martin KieferAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited

P. Donald RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Tay Valley Township

Kathy Coulthart-DeweyAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of London

Don SimpsonAgent
1 appearance
Phillip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the County of Brant

Valerie M'GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Dunnville

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Kingsville

Bruce D. CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of North Perth

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Caledonia

Philip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Ekfrid

John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Michael DeVosAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Hay

Kimberly EvansCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Mariposa

Steve KarpazisAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Mariposa

Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Murray

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Peter Bryan-PulhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norwich

John KuntzeAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent, the Township of Russell

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Sullivan

David GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Wainfleet

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BradleyAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Caledon

Nadia KoltunCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket and the Town of East Gwillimbury

Susan PlamondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of New Tecumseth

William D. TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Brethour

Dorothy WhiteAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Caledonia

David ShelleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Clearview

Don McNaltyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of King

Josie MateraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Leeds and Thousand Islands

John A. TrudgenAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Jeffery, appellant

Murray JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Van Moorsel Farms Ltd.

Izaak de RijckeCounsel
1 appearance

Lutheran Church, Cemetery Board

Elmer GordnerAgent
1 appearance

Mayor, Municipality of West Perth

John VanBakelAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 17 appellants

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Barry RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Bart DerbisAgent
1 appearance
Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Peter EdisburyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of assessed owners Keith West, Dale McFeeters and Seldon Parker (Tampa Farms), John Yeomans

William TurvilleAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Dale and Linda Kramer, assessed owners

James RailtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of D. Lassaline, assessed landowner

Charlie LassalineAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Gary Beach, assessed landowner

Al FrasierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and several other appellants

Jack DeleplanqueSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Joan Dann, assessed owner

Christopher DannAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Larry Lampman, assessed owner

Ronald J. LampmanAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Mr. Haines

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Capri Realties Ltd.

Germain TessierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Hallstead Farms Limited

Gerald NewellAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Ruth McFeeters

Dale McFeetersAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicant, Moran’s Farm Supplies Ltd.

Mark BarrangerAgent
1 appearance
Pat MoranAgent
1 appearance
Tim MoranAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality

Janisse ZimmermanAgent
1 appearance
Patrick HaggittAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Retail Farm Equipment Dealers Association (ORFEDA)

Beverley LeavittAgent
1 appearance
Doug ArnottAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Wholesale Farm Equipment Association (OWFEA)

Erik SkjavelandAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent

Garth NoeckerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IllnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AGRICORP

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, New Holland Canada Ltd.

Rory ChisholmAgent
1 appearance
Roy BarronAgent
1 appearance
Simon WilsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Goderich

Andrew McBrideAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent the Corporation of the Township of Stanley

Rob WaltonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Haldimand

Robert HeilAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Lincoln

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Ken SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Town of Pelham

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Adelaide

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of East Wawanosh

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance
Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Fullarton

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Malahide

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Moore

Ron KerrAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of South-West Oxford

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Turnberry

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

Bryan WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Bosanquet

Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Laurie CoxAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of West Carleton

Brian CarryAgent
1 appearance
Glen GordonAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

Ontario Ministry of Transportation

Karen WilsonAgent
2 appearances

party

David O'NeillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald FournieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russell EyreSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the appeal

Bruce GowlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel LenartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ewen MacNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley A. McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance

President, Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP)

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Stanley, assessed owner

Jack ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing D. & K. Loucks, M. & K. Dimitrick, W. & B. Reid, V. & S. Chanyi, G. DeWit, T. Buys, R. Zweers, W. Zweers, S Fielder & C. Agnew, M. Leal, R. & L. Vanbesien, P. Reid, R. Tipping, J. Woulters, T. Moonen and M. Mitchell.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing Keith Lewis

John FildawAgent
1 appearance

representing Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner 15 Charles St.

Allen BuddenAgent
1 appearance

representing R.J.Burnside & Associates Ltd. (the "Engineer")

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

respondent to the motion

Harry McBrideSelf-represented
1 appearance

Road Superintendent

Dave HartleyAgent
1 appearance

solicitor for the respondent, the Town of Hawkesbury

J. J. Edmond WoodsCounsel
1 appearance

solicitor for William Easton

Phillip MorrisseyCounsel
1 appearance

spokesperson for the appellant

Lane GardnerAgent
1 appearance

Tampa Bay Farms, assessed landowner

Terry ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

to the respondent, the Township of Longueuil

Michael ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

unknown

Henry BosAgent
1 appearance

witness

Keith BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance

118

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.1

cases/mo

OAFRAAT118(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 5 of 6 (118 cases)