Who is Andrew Osyany?

Andrew Osyany is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does Andrew Osyany sit on?

Andrew Osyany sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does Andrew Osyany decide?

Andrew Osyany's most common areas include Administrative Law (114 decisions), Other Tribunals (107 decisions), Environmental Law (43 decisions). Andrew Osyany has handled 118 decisions across 5 areas.

How many decisions has Andrew Osyany made?

Andrew Osyany has 118 decisions on record from 1995 to 2004.

Who frequently appears before Andrew Osyany?

Representatives who frequently appear before Andrew Osyany include Husseinali Shivji, Evelyn Hambly, William Cryderman.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Andrew Osyany — Vice-Chair

Corporate/Commercial Law

Andrew Osyany

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1995

118

cases · 10 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-Chair· 53Vice Chair· 44Vice Chair· 10Vice Chair· 4Vice-Chair· 3Vice-Chair· 3Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 10, 2003

Appeals of engineer's report and drainage assessments dismissed; proposed drainage works found appropriate.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the revised engineer's report regarding the Klijn Drain under sections 48 and 54 of the Drainage Act.

The appellant argued that the proposed drainage works did not drain the total watershed and objected to special benefit assessments for engineering work on a proposed extension.

The Tribunal found that the drainage works described in the report were appropriate and that the engineer could not extend the drain upstream without a valid petition.

The Tribunal also upheld the assessments, finding them equitable and justified, and dismissed the appeals.

Klijn Drain – 2003 (Re), 2003 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 7, 2002

Application for review of Tribunal decision regarding farm access bridge dismissed.

The applicant, an assessed owner on a municipal drain, applied for a review of a previous Tribunal decision that ordered a farm access bridge to be constructed in accordance with an engineer's report.

The applicant argued that the Tribunal did not accept his evidence or draw his desired conclusions.

The Tribunal dismissed the review application, finding no material error of law or fact in the original decision.

George Vanderbeke Farm Access Bridge over the 10th Concession Branch of the Irwin Drain (RE), 2002 ONAFRAAT 39

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 4, 2002

Tribunal adjourned review of drainage works decision to require detailed plans and cost estimates.

The Municipality of Thames Centre requested a review of the Tribunal's previous decision regarding the Walker Drain Improvement project, citing new evidence about utility lines and costs that made the Tribunal's ordered route more expensive.

The Tribunal heard evidence from the municipality's engineer and several assessed landowners.

Finding the evidence insufficient to justify altering the route without further investigation, the Tribunal adjourned the hearing and ordered the engineer to provide detailed plans, cost estimates, and consultation reports for alternative routes before making a final determination.

Municipality of Thames Centre v. Loucks, 2002 ONAFRAAT 38

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 31, 2002

Joint motion to resolve turkey pricing appeal via final offer selection process granted.

The appellant and respondent jointly brought a preliminary motion requesting that the Tribunal deal with an appeal of a turkey pricing order by way of a final offer selection process.

The Tribunal noted that both parties favoured this resolution method and were familiar with it from previous appeals.

The Tribunal granted the motion and ordered that the dispute be settled by final offer arbitration.

Turkey Committee of the Ontario Poultry Processors’ Association v Ontario Turkey Producers’ Marketing Board, 2002 ONAFRAAT 37

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 4, 2002

Municipality ordered to adopt engineer's report for drainage works after Tribunal finds project cost-beneficial.

The appellant petitioned for drainage works to address seasonal flooding on agricultural lands.

The municipal council refused to adopt the engineer's report, citing cost-benefit concerns.

On appeal, the Tribunal found overwhelming evidence of the necessity of the proposed drainage works and accepted the project engineer's unchallenged professional opinion that the benefits justified the costs.

The Tribunal ordered the municipality to pass the provisional by-law adopting the engineer's report.

Rhéo Bouchard v. The Municipality of West Nipissing, 2002 ONAFRAAT 36

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 29, 2002

Drainage Act appeal dismissed following negotiated settlement between the landowner and the municipality.

The appellant appealed a municipal council's decision to reject a petition for drainage works on his properties under section 5 of the Drainage Act.

During the hearing, the parties negotiated Minutes of Settlement wherein the appellant agreed to withdraw his petition and pay a portion of the engineering fees, while the municipality agreed to consider drainage improvements.

The Tribunal accepted the settlement, dismissed the appeal, and made no order as to costs.

Dr. Kenneth G. Allan v. Tay Valley Township, 2002 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 31, 2002

Tribunal restores original engineer's report for drain improvement, finding council's reversal arbitrary.

The appellant appealed a municipal council's decision to adopt a revised engineer's report that deleted the proposed closing in of a portion of a municipal drain on his property.

The Tribunal found that the original report proposing the closing in was engineeringly sound and properly assessed.

The Tribunal held that the council's reversal of its initial approval was arbitrary and based solely on the presence of opponents at a council meeting, rather than on the merits of the project.

The appeal was granted, and the municipality was ordered to adopt the original report and absorb the costs of the revised report.

John Vanderkloet v. Township of Enniskillen, 2002 ONAFRAAT 28

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 30, 2002

Tribunal approves settlement amending drainage assessment schedule to transfer outlet liability to road benefit assessments.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Outlet Portion of the 2nd Concession Drain West of Wigle Creek.

The parties reached a settlement and submitted a joint recommendation to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal accepted the minutes of settlement, dismissing the appeal of the engineer's report and allowing the appeal from the Court of Revision to amend the assessment schedule by transferring $36,500 from outlet liability to benefit assessments for two roads.

Eric Denotter and Russell W. Rogers v. Town of Kingsville, 2002 ONAFRAAT 27

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 23, 2002

Appeal of engineer's report dismissed as withdrawal of petitioner rendered drainage petition invalid.

The appellant appealed an engineer's report under section 48 of the Drainage Act which determined that the proposed Allan-Connell Municipal Drain could not be constructed.

The engineer filed a section 40 report after a petitioner withdrew her name, rendering the petition for drainage invalid.

The Tribunal upheld the engineer's report, finding that the area requiring drainage was correctly identified and that it was impractical to proceed with the drainage works due to the invalid petition.

The appeal was dismissed.

Allan-Connell Municipal Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 25

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 29, 2002

Engineer's report for municipal drain improvement referred back for redesign of route and reassessment of costs.

Several assessed landowners appealed the engineer's report for the Walker Drain Improvement under section 48 of the Drainage Act.

The appellants argued that the proposed route for the drain relocation was not optimal and that the assessment of costs was unfair.

The Tribunal ordered the engineer's report to be referred back to the engineer to redesign the drain along an alternative route proposed by the appellants' engineer, which more closely aligned with the existing drain and minimized property damage.

The Tribunal also ordered modifications to the assessment methodology, adjusting the allocation of statutory benefits between roads and residential lands.

K. Loucks et al. v. Municipality of Thames Centre, 2002 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 1, 2002

Tribunal granted municipality permission to procure an engineer's report to vary drainage assessments.

The applicant municipality applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal under section 76 of the Drainage Act for permission to procure an engineer's report to vary the assessments for maintenance and repair of the Harper Municipal Drain.

The Tribunal found that conditions had changed, justifying a variation, and granted the requested permission.

Harper Municipal Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 16

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 28, 2002

Tribunal ordered municipal drain to follow natural Western route rather than more expensive Northern route.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the proposed Klijn Municipal Drain.

The engineer had proposed a Northern route for a closed tile drain, which was more expensive but preferred by neighbouring landowners to avoid crossing their properties.

The appellant argued for a Western route following the natural flow of water or an open ditch.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, finding that the Western route was cheaper, followed the natural water flow, and would service the entire watershed.

The Tribunal directed the municipality to refer the report back to the engineer to design the drain along the Western route and give downstream owners the option of an open or closed drain.

Klijn Municipal Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 18, 2002

Tribunal refused to hear out-of-time appeal where appellant processor engaged in self-help over dockage dispute.

The appellant processor sought to appeal an order of the respondent board regarding a dockage dispute over potato shipments.

The appeal was filed more than one year after the appellant had knowledge of the order.

The Tribunal held a pre-hearing conference to determine whether to exercise its discretion under s. 16(4) of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Act to hear the appeal despite the delay.

The Tribunal declined to hear the appeal, finding that the appellant had engaged in self-help by withholding funds rather than utilizing the regulated marketing system's dispute resolution mechanisms in a timely manner.

The Saratoga Potato Chip Company Inc., o/e Olde York Potato Chips v Ontario Potato Board, 2002 ONAFRAAT 8

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 14, 2002

Tribunal orders municipality to appoint engineer for preliminary drainage report at appellants' sole expense.

The appellants appealed a municipal council's decision to deny their petition for drainage works under the Drainage Act.

The appellants argued that their lands required better drainage and requested the appointment of an engineer to assess the municipal drain's capacity.

The municipality and other assessed landowners opposed the petition, arguing the drain was recently cleaned and functioning properly.

The Tribunal found the petition invalid under Section 4 but, noting the appellants' offer to fund a preliminary report, ordered the municipality to appoint an engineer to prepare a preliminary report at the appellants' sole expense.

Lois M. Hayter and W. Glenn Hayter v. Municipality of Bluewater, 2002 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 12, 2001

Crop insurance appeal granted in part; AGRICORP ordered to recalculate simulated yield using adjusted co-operator data.

The appellant appealed AGRICORP's adjustment of his 2000 hay crop claim under the Crop Insurance Forage Plan.

The appellant argued that the computer-simulated yield (SIMFOY) was inaccurate due to faulty rain gauges and unrepresentative weather data locations.

The Tribunal found no proof of basic error in rainfall data collection but noted a large discrepancy between co-operators' actual yields and the simulated yield.

Finding the appellant credible regarding his actual yield being lower than recorded, the Tribunal granted the appeal in part and ordered AGRICORP to recalculate the simulated yield using an actual co-operator yield of 66% of normal.

Samis v. Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 55

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 22, 2001

Preliminary motion for stay and document production withdrawn; consent order issued limiting quota enforcement remedies.

Sunnybrook Farms brought a preliminary motion seeking a stay of enforcement actions by the Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) regarding its chicken slaughter quota, and an order compelling the Association of Ontario Chicken Processors to produce documents.

During the pre-hearing conference, Sunnybrook Farms withdrew its motion after reaching an agreement with the CFO.

The Tribunal issued an order reflecting the parties' agreement, limiting the CFO's enforcement remedies to the forfeiture of an $8,000 letter of credit for non-compliance in specific quota periods pending the final outcome of the appeal.

Sunnybrook Farms v Chicken Farmers of Ontario, 2001 ONAFRAAT 54

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 22, 2001

Drainage appeal dismissed and costs awarded against appellant who refused to participate after alleging bias.

The appellant appealed the Engineer's Report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the repair and improvement of the Washington Municipal Drain.

The appellant raised concerns about assessments, allowances, cost-benefit justification, and environmental impacts, but refused to call evidence or submit to the Tribunal's jurisdiction, alleging bias and filing a mid-hearing appeal to the Drainage Referee.

The Tribunal dismissed the jurisdictional and bias challenges, proceeded with the hearing, and accepted the engineer's overwhelming evidence that the drainage works were necessary and the assessments fair.

The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay $8,000 in costs to the municipality due to his highly adversarial and unmeritorious approach.

Washington Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 50

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 24, 2001

Drainage works approved but assessments amended; engineer penalized for omitting assessment methodology from report.

Several landowners appealed the decision of the Court of Revision and the Engineer's Report regarding the Balls Drain 2000 in the Township of Blandford-Blenheim.

The appellants argued that the proposed drainage works were too costly, the drain was over-designed, and the assessments were unfair.

The Tribunal found that the construction of the drain was warranted and the design was appropriate.

However, the Tribunal amended some of the assessments, finding that a benefit assessment should be applied to the property obtaining a new legal outlet.

The Tribunal also penalized the engineer in costs for failing to include the methodology and rationale for the assessments in the report.

Balls Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 44

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 18, 2001

Crop insurance appeal dismissed; simulated yield model correctly applied despite payout disparities among neighbours.

The appellant appealed a decision by AGRICORP concerning the adjustment of his crop insurance claim for his 2000 hay crop under the Crop Insurance Forage Plan.

The appellant argued that the computer-simulated yield model unfairly resulted in a significantly lower payout for his farm compared to his neighbours.

The Tribunal found that AGRICORP administered the Forage Plan correctly and in accordance with the insurance agreement purchased by the appellant.

The appeal was dismissed, though the Tribunal recommended AGRICORP investigate amending the plan to use a fairer 'smart circle' methodology.

Hietkamp v. Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 43

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 17, 2001

Application to adjourn hearing sine die pending appeals to the Referee dismissed.

The appellant requested an adjournment of the hearing sine die because he elected to file appeals from previous Tribunal decisions to the Referee, and intended to bring an application to the Referee for a declaration that the proposed drainage work does not comply with the Drainage Act.

The respondent and other represented parties opposed the request.

The Tribunal dismissed the application to adjourn, noting its obligation to deal with matters fairly and expeditiously in the absence of a valid order of prohibition.

Carl King v. City of Kawartha Lakes, 2001 ONAFRAAT 42

Page 2 of 6 (118 cases)

advocate for Mr. Mervin Martin

Clifford StephensAgent
1 appearance

advocate for the appellant

Harry DenHaanAgent
1 appearance

agent for Lois Hayter

Glenn HayterAgent
1 appearance

agent for Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner

Allan ButtonAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Alec KellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Al YagminasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anna HaasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne CoyneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. JohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carl HillebrechtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caroline DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Catherine GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charles FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chris BrazeauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dan FroeseSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darlene BowenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dave ForsythSelf-represented
1 appearance
Denton MeiklejohnSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SpencerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dr. Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward DownSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ethel BarkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

Appellant

Burt HodginsSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Robert AchesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
William EastonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Basilla GrubbeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

William CrydermanSelf-represented
2 appearances

appellants

Edward AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carol AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellants in person

John WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph FarnsworthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joyce ShackSelf-represented
1 appearance
W. J. MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ann McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris McArthurSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WallaceSelf-represented
1 appearance
John McGibbonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
3 appearances
Ann WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Murray BeachSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gerry BakerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Reg CableSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andy DeverellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Frank WarlandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Serge PharandSelf-represented
2 appearances
Shawn PowellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Wes CraigSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian FumertonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Linda FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Daryl LoucksSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marjorie CampbellSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jim FosterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steve ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vick HarrisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne FerrisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Adrian BrouwerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 14 Charles St.

Gerry BakerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 19 Charles St.

Carl GillespieSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner, 26 Charles St.

Gerry DeWittSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Allan HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Greg HoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie HayterSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Albertine CroftSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anne VanderbrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard KordyjakaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce Van KemenadeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Chester DannSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doris ToeppSelf-represented
1 appearance
John OosterveldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Josh FullanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louise LordSelf-represented
1 appearance
Maurice VanhouckeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray LampmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard BeauchampSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rodney McCabeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephen ScotchmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stewart McPhersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sylvester. PhilipsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer

Dean WebbSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard AbrahamSelf-represented
1 appearance

assisting the appellant

Marielle KlijnAgent
1 appearance

Ausauble Bayfield Conservation Authority

Ryan HernAgent
1 appearance

counsel, to Mrs. Beverley Misener

Ralph BenedictCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Callum SheddenCounsel
1 appearance
D. GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Norman Peel, Q. C.Counsel
1 appearance
Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Sunnybrook Farms

Ron FolkesCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the applicant, the Director of Regulatory Compliance

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, CFO

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Camden

J. WickettCounsel
2 appearances

counsel to the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

Deputy Mayor, on behalf of the Municipal Council, Township of Enniskillen

Jim BurnsAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Reeve, Township of Brethour

Tom GoddardAgent
1 appearance

downstream landowner

Catherine KwarciakSelf-represented
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

E. Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared the engineer's report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for Bradford West Gwillimbury and Township of King

Art JanseAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, for the Municipality of Thames Centre

Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

John M. SprietAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for 1060008 Ontario Ltd.

Doug VollmershausenAgent
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
4 appearances
Judith Kay-SchecterAgent
2 appearances
Fred ThomsonAgent
2 appearances
Jim ZavitzAgent
2 appearances
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
Roger GeysensAgent
1 appearance

for Carl Hillebrecht, appellant

Andy McBrideAgent
1 appearance

for Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Laurel BaigCounsel
1 appearance

for Cowan Farm Drainage, respondent

Mike CowanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Evelyn Cleland, Murray Teel, Colin Campbell and W. Christopher Dale

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Fernand Gauthier

Garnet McDiarmidAgent
1 appearance

for Florence McCarl

Jack McCarlAgent
1 appearance

for Francesco and Rosetta Iannialice, appellants

Jack DavisAgent
1 appearance

for Gary Beach, appellant

Al FraserAgent
2 appearances

for George Vanderbeke

Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance

for Green Lane Environmental, appellant

Anne HiscockAgent
1 appearance
Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for himself

Brian BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don KolkeaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward WestSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fernand GauthierSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. MullerSelf-represented
1 appearance
John SoenenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken BearssSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mervin MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nick WallSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ray SwaimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard GosselinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Willey McLellanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for K. Smart Associates Ltd.

Ken SmartAgent
2 appearances

for Lana Hicks and George Boothe, assessed owners

Bob CarrierAgent
1 appearance

for Margaret Munro

Colin StillCounsel
1 appearance

for Maria Janzen

Suzanna JanzenAgent
1 appearance

for Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for Olde York Potato Chips

Donald ShortCounsel
1 appearance
William GeorgesCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter VanKruistum, appellant

Bradley StoneCounsel
1 appearance

for R.J. Burnside & Associates Limited

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for Robert and David Groszeibl, Joseph and Elizabeth Groszeibl, and Mr. William Van Vliet

Christopher WilsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Schnurr's Country Market Ltd.

Dave SchnurrAgent
1 appearance

for several appellants

Steven RennerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R. Graham, F.&R. Graham, J.&R. Graham, Oakwood Agromart Ltd., 1035485 Ontario Ltd., G. Butterworth et al., J. Everson, J. Garland, J.&J. Hickson and J. Hickson

William TurvilleCounsel
2 appearances

for Thames Valley District School Board

Charles M. AttardAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant

Peter KlijnSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clayton WattersAgent
1 appearance
Darlene BowenAgent
1 appearance
Donald HorneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald JefferyAgent
1 appearance
Edwin HornerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim ColeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van DiepenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth AllanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret VanceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Neil CockwellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter DutchakAgent
1 appearance
Bob WieringaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rein MinnemaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rheo BouchardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard DwornikiewiczSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert G. ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Arie Voskamp

Brian VoskampAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Ilze Abolins

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Landmark

David SeedCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant landowner

Ken TovellSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellant, Meat A Chick Inc.

Robert LaplanteAgent
1 appearance
Ronald F. CazaCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Medallion Holsteins Ltd.

Jay CarterAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Carl King

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Martin Van Geffen

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Peter Wang

Denis WangAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Ruth McFeeters

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Barbara PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brenda CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Edward CzerniawskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernest PuhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vic SauroAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, Andy Klemencic, Stan Klemencic and 818743 Ontario Ltd.

Mark KlemencicAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Eric Denotter and Russell W. Rogers

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, except Mr. & Mrs. Gauthier

Alan MacKinnonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Georgina May and Rosalind May Loffredo

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants, John and Karen Campbell

Richard KnottCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Pat and Ann Hutchinson

T. HutchinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Ramsay et al.

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Thames Bend Farms Ltd.

Rosemary SteinAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

James EllisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the applicant, the Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant the Township of Longueuil

Michael A. ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

for The Association of Ontario Chicken Processors

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Restaurant and Foodservices Association

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kawartha Lakes

R. J. SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kingston

Jim EnglishAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Cam MilneAgent
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario

Steven MclnnisAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Guy CormierAgent
2 appearances
Jim CaldwellAgent
2 appearances
Dennis ShandAgent
1 appearance
John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Richard TannerAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Southwest Middlesex and the Engineer's Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Thames Centre

David BroadCounsel
2 appearances
D. BroadCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Independent Poultry Processors

Arlen SternbergCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Potato Board

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance
Doug GreenAgent
1 appearance
Jean Pierre (Jay) BarbeauAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
JoAnn CraneAgent
1 appearance
Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance
Lloyd PerrinAgent
1 appearance
Martin KieferAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent McNeely Engineering Consultants Limited

P. Donald RasmussenCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Tay Valley Township

Kathy Coulthart-DeweyAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the City of London

Don SimpsonAgent
1 appearance
Phillip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the County of Brant

Valerie M'GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Dunnville

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of Kingsville

Bruce D. CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of North Perth

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Caledonia

Philip McNeelyAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Ekfrid

John SprietAgent
1 appearance
Michael DeVosAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Hay

Kimberly EvansCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Mariposa

Steve KarpazisAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Mariposa

Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Murray

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Peter Bryan-PulhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Norwich

John KuntzeAgent
2 appearances

for the respondent, the Township of Russell

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Sullivan

David GrahlmanAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Wainfleet

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance
Ralph BradleyAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Caledon

Nadia KoltunCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket and the Town of East Gwillimbury

Susan PlamondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of New Tecumseth

William D. TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Brethour

Dorothy WhiteAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Caledonia

David ShelleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Clearview

Don McNaltyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of King

Josie MateraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of Leeds and Thousand Islands

John A. TrudgenAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Norfolk

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Wainfleet

George BanksCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Jeffery, appellant

Murray JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Van Moorsel Farms Ltd.

Izaak de RijckeCounsel
1 appearance

Lutheran Church, Cemetery Board

Elmer GordnerAgent
1 appearance

Mayor, Municipality of West Perth

John VanBakelAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 17 appellants

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of AGRICORP

Barry RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Bart DerbisAgent
1 appearance
Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Peter EdisburyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of assessed owners Keith West, Dale McFeeters and Seldon Parker (Tampa Farms), John Yeomans

William TurvilleAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Dale and Linda Kramer, assessed owners

James RailtonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of D. Lassaline, assessed landowner

Charlie LassalineAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Gary Beach, assessed landowner

Al FrasierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of himself and several other appellants

Jack DeleplanqueSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of Joan Dann, assessed owner

Christopher DannAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Larry Lampman, assessed owner

Ronald J. LampmanAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Mr. Haines

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Capri Realties Ltd.

Germain TessierAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Hallstead Farms Limited

Gerald NewellAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant Ruth McFeeters

Dale McFeetersAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the applicant, Moran’s Farm Supplies Ltd.

Mark BarrangerAgent
1 appearance
Pat MoranAgent
1 appearance
Tim MoranAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Municipality

Janisse ZimmermanAgent
1 appearance
Patrick HaggittAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Retail Farm Equipment Dealers Association (ORFEDA)

Beverley LeavittAgent
1 appearance
Doug ArnottAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Ontario Wholesale Farm Equipment Association (OWFEA)

Erik SkjavelandAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent

Garth NoeckerAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IllnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, AGRICORP

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, New Holland Canada Ltd.

Rory ChisholmAgent
1 appearance
Roy BarronAgent
1 appearance
Simon WilsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Blandford-Blenheim

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Goderich

Andrew McBrideAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent the Corporation of the Township of Stanley

Rob WaltonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Haldimand

Robert HeilAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Lincoln

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance
Ken SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Town of Pelham

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Adelaide

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of East Wawanosh

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance
Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Fullarton

David JohnsonAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Malahide

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Moore

Ron KerrAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of South-West Oxford

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Turnberry

Andrew McBrideAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Wainfleet

Bryan WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Bosanquet

Bill VeitchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township

Laurie CoxAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of West Carleton

Brian CarryAgent
1 appearance
Glen GordonAgent
1 appearance
Jim McIntoshAgent
1 appearance
Todd PerryAgent
1 appearance

Ontario Ministry of Transportation

Karen WilsonAgent
2 appearances

party

David O'NeillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald FournieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Russell EyreSelf-represented
1 appearance

party to the appeal

Bruce GowlandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel LenartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ewen MacNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley A. McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance

President, Association of Ontario Chicken Processors (AOCP)

Robert ShapiroAgent
1 appearance

Reeve, Township of Stanley, assessed owner

Jack ColemanSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing D. & K. Loucks, M. & K. Dimitrick, W. & B. Reid, V. & S. Chanyi, G. DeWit, T. Buys, R. Zweers, W. Zweers, S Fielder & C. Agnew, M. Leal, R. & L. Vanbesien, P. Reid, R. Tipping, J. Woulters, T. Moonen and M. Mitchell.

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

representing Keith Lewis

John FildawAgent
1 appearance

representing Margaret Mitchell, assessed landowner 15 Charles St.

Allen BuddenAgent
1 appearance

representing R.J.Burnside & Associates Ltd. (the "Engineer")

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

respondent to the motion

Harry McBrideSelf-represented
1 appearance

Road Superintendent

Dave HartleyAgent
1 appearance

solicitor for the respondent, the Town of Hawkesbury

J. J. Edmond WoodsCounsel
1 appearance

solicitor for William Easton

Phillip MorrisseyCounsel
1 appearance

spokesperson for the appellant

Lane GardnerAgent
1 appearance

Tampa Bay Farms, assessed landowner

Terry ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

to the respondent, the Township of Longueuil

Michael ChambersCounsel
1 appearance

unknown

Henry BosAgent
1 appearance

witness

Keith BathoSelf-represented
1 appearance

118

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.1

cases/mo

OAFRAAT118(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

trial

Page 2 of 6 (118 cases)