Adam P. Strombergsson De Nora

This costs endorsement follows the granting of anti-SLAPP motions by the three defendants.

The court addresses the scale and quantum of costs, the issue of duplication between legal teams, and the entitlement of a self-represented litigant to costs.

The court awards full indemnity costs to the defendants, finding the requests fair and reasonable, and declines to award compensation to the self-represented defendant for his own time.

The defendants brought motions under s. 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act to dismiss the plaintiff's defamation action as a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP).

The plaintiff, a former Complaints and Appeals Officer for a national sports organization, sued the defendants over emails they sent criticizing his handling of complaints and his suitability for the role.

The court found that the defendants' expressions related to a matter of public interest regarding athlete safety.

While the defamation claim had substantial merit, the plaintiff failed to show that the defendants lacked valid defences, such as justification and qualified privilege.

Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to provide evidence of serious harm caused by the expressions that would outweigh the public interest in protecting them.

The motions were granted and the action was dismissed.

The appellants appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board.

Shortly before the hearing, the self-represented respondent advised the court that she wished to respond to the appeal in French and be addressed in French.

The panel adjourned the matter to be heard on the merits by a bilingual panel in the interests of justice.

The appellants appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board.

Shortly before the hearing, the self-represented respondent requested to respond to the appeal in French and to be addressed in French.

The Divisional Court adjourned the matter to be heard on the merits by a bilingual panel in the interests of justice.