4 total
Appeals allowed in part to approve a settlement for a 51-storey mixed-use development.
The appellant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on applications for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a mixed-use tall building.
The parties reached a settlement for a 51-storey tower on a four-storey podium.
Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found the settlement proposal consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, in conformity with the Growth Plan and Official Plan, and representative of good planning.
The Tribunal allowed the appeals in part, approving the amendments in principle, and withheld its final order pending the fulfillment of conditions.
Zoning by-law amendment for 14-storey mixed-use building approved as representing good land use planning.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application to permit a 14-storey mixed-use building.
The Tribunal heard uncontested expert evidence that the proposed development is appropriate, fits harmoniously with the existing context, and meets the intent of the applicable policy framework.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and approved the zoning by-law amendment, finding it represents good land use planning and is in the public interest.
Tribunal schedules second Case Management Conference and five-day merit hearing for zoning by-law amendment appeal.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to render a decision on a zoning by-law amendment application within the statutory timeframe.
The application proposed a 66-storey mixed-use building.
At the first Case Management Conference, the Tribunal granted party status to 320 Front Portfolio Inc. The Tribunal scheduled a second Case Management Conference and a five-day hearing on the merits of the appeal.
Revised settlement for a residential development approved and Interim Order amended based on uncontested planning evidence.
The applicant appealed the City of Toronto's failure to make decisions on applications for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan for a residential development on Symington Avenue.
Following an earlier Interim Order approving a settlement, the parties reached a revised settlement reflecting design changes, including a shift to a purpose-built rental building and increased height and density.
Based on uncontested planning evidence, the Tribunal approved the revised settlement and amended the Interim Order, finding the proposal consistent with provincial policies and representing good planning.
