Yves Berthiaume

The appellant appealed his conviction for first degree murder, arguing the trial judge erred in his jury instructions regarding the burden of proof for an alibi and the requirement for a unanimous verdict.

The Supreme Court of Canada agreed with the dissenting appellate judge that the trial judge erred in law on both issues.

The Court declined to apply the curative proviso under s. 613(1)(b)(iii) of the Criminal Code due to the cumulative effect of the errors.

The appeal was allowed and a new trial ordered.

The accused were charged with unlawful possession of stolen bonds, conspiracy to defraud, and attempt to defraud the Bank of Montreal.

The trial judge directed a verdict of acquittal on the fraud counts, finding no evidence of intent to defraud the Bank of Montreal, and refused to amend the indictment.

During jury deliberations on the possession count, the trial judge questioned two jurors in chambers without the accused present regarding the impartiality of other jurors.

The jury convicted on the possession count.

The Court of Appeal ordered a new trial on all counts.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed all appeals, holding that the in-chambers inquiry violated the accused's right to be present at trial under s. 577 of the Criminal Code, and that the indictment should have been amended to remove the reference to the Bank of Montreal as it was mere surplusage and caused no prejudice.

The accused were charged with unlawful possession of stolen bonds, conspiracy to defraud, and attempt to defraud the Bank of Montreal.

The trial judge directed a verdict of acquittal on the fraud counts, finding no evidence of intent to defraud the Bank of Montreal, and refused to amend the indictment.

During jury deliberations on the possession count, the trial judge questioned two jurors in chambers without the accused present regarding the impartiality of other jurors.

The jury convicted on the possession count.

The Court of Appeal ordered a new trial on all counts.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed all appeals, holding that the in-chambers inquiry violated the accused's right to be present at trial under s. 577 of the Criminal Code, and that the indictment should have been amended to remove the reference to the Bank of Montreal as it was mere surplusage and caused no prejudice.

The appellant appealed his conviction for fraud and conspiracy to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the arguments submitted did not persuade them that the judgment of the Court of Appeal was ill-founded.