The respondent movie theatre chain brought a motion to adjourn the combined hearing of three human rights complaints regarding the lack of captioning in theatres.
The respondent argued the hearing should be delayed until new, related complaints filed by one of the complainants against other major theatre chains were referred to the Tribunal, to ensure an industry-wide resolution.
The complainants and the Commission opposed the adjournment, citing prejudice from delay.
The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that proceeding without the other major exhibitors could lead to a multiplicity of proceedings and unfairness, and noted that the complainant herself had generated some of the delay by filing new complaints.
The Tribunal also removed two personal respondents on consent.