On a mid-trial application for a directed verdict, a self-represented accused sought acquittal on bid-rigging and conspiracy counts arising from a multi-accused prosecution concerning a Transport Canada RFP.
Applying the directed verdict standard, the court held that the Crown's case against the moving party rested on thin direct evidence and circumstantial inferences that were not reasonably available on the whole of the record.
The evidence established only knowledge of and limited participation in his company's own joint venture proposal, which was not illegal.
There was no evidence capable of supporting membership in the larger alleged three-bid scheme or conspiracy.
A directed verdict of acquittal was entered on both counts.
