The applicants, charged with possession of fentanyl and cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, applied for a stay of proceedings under s. 11(b) of the Charter, arguing unreasonable delay.
The anticipated trial date was 45 months after the charges were laid, exceeding the 30-month presumptive ceiling.
The court deducted periods of defence delay, including communal delay for counsel unavailability, and exceptional circumstances delay arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, an unavailable witness, and the assigned judge's illness.
After deductions, the net delay fell below the presumptive ceiling.
The application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed.