Talitha A. Nabbali

A federal inmate brought a habeas corpus application challenging a decision by prison authorities to reclassify and involuntarily transfer him from medium security to maximum security.

The inmate argued that correctional authorities improperly withheld information relied upon in the transfer decision under s. 27(3) of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.

The court reviewed sealed materials and compared them with the summaries provided to the inmate.

It found that important information was not disclosed in gist form and that the reliability of sources had not been adequately addressed as required by governing jurisprudence.

The court held that these failures rendered the decision procedurally unfair and unlawful.

The defendant Attorney General of Canada brought a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s action for failure to comply with documentary production obligations and court‑ordered timetables under the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The defendant argued the plaintiff had repeatedly breached production orders over many years and had effectively manipulated the court process.

The court held that although the plaintiff had not fully complied with certain production orders, the record demonstrated ongoing document production and substantial efforts by counsel to comply.

The alleged prejudice arising from delay was largely speculative and unsupported by evidence.

The court concluded the plaintiff had not abused the court process and that dismissal was unwarranted.