The appellants appealed an order upholding a master's decision concerning documentary production, redactions, and costs.
The appellants argued the respondents' motion to the master was an impermissible attempt to vary a prior order and sought to introduce fresh evidence regarding informant privilege.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the master's prior order contemplated protective terms for productions and the fresh evidence did not defeat the informant privilege claim.
The appeal was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondents.
