A non-lawyer, Stuart Murray, sought leave to represent the plaintiff corporation, Cowal Chalmers Inc., in this action.
The defendant opposed the motion, citing Murray's disbarment and alleged inability to represent the corporation effectively.
The court, applying Rule 15.01(2) factors, granted leave, finding that as the sole shareholder, officer, and director, Murray was intricately connected to the corporation and reasonably capable of representation.
The court also found the corporation was financially unable to retain counsel, emphasizing access to justice.
Arguments regarding Murray's disbarment and a potential conflict of interest due to a third-party claim against him were considered and dismissed as not precluding his representation.
