4 total
Mandatory Rand formula dues survived Charter challenge in the public sector.
A public sector employee challenged a Rand formula dues check-off clause and related statutory provisions, arguing that compulsory union dues used for political and social causes violated the Charter.
The Court held that the Charter applied because the dues obligation arose through government action involving a Crown-controlled public sector employer.
A majority dismissed the appeal, concluding there was no infringement of freedom of expression and no basis for relief under freedom of association, although the judges differed significantly on whether s. 2(d) included protection against compelled association and whether any prima facie infringement occurred.
The decision is a leading authority on Charter application to public sector labour relations, compelled association, and the constitutional treatment of mandatory union dues.
Motion to dismiss granted; work assignment dispute cannot be framed as unfair labour practice complaint.
The complainant union filed unfair labour practice complaints against Ontario Hydro, EPSCA, and several construction trade unions, alleging violations of multiple sections of the Labour Relations Act arising from the implementation of a Maintenance Assist Agreement for nuclear reactor retubing work.
Ontario Hydro and EPSCA brought a motion to dismiss the complaints.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board allowed the motion and dismissed the complaints, finding that the dispute was fundamentally a jurisdictional dispute over work assignment rather than a representational issue or a violation of bargaining rights under the Act.
A dissenting member would have allowed the complaint to proceed to a hearing on the merits.
Cease and desist direction issued for illegal strike at nuclear facility despite return to work.
The applicant employer sought a declaration and a cease and desist direction under section 92 of the Labour Relations Act in respect of an illegal work stoppage at its nuclear generating facilities.
Although the employees had returned to work by the time of the hearing, the Board exercised its discretion to issue the requested relief.
The Board found that the underlying collective bargaining dispute remained unresolved, the union stewards lacked control over the situation, and the strike had significant implications beyond the immediate parties due to the safety and environmental risks associated with nuclear facilities.
Motion to dismiss unfair labour practice complaint granted as allegations constituted a latent jurisdictional dispute.
The complainant union filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging violations of sections 48, 49, 64, 66, 67, and 70 of the Labour Relations Act, arising from Ontario Hydro assigning nuclear reactor retubing work to members of various construction trade unions under Maintenance Assist Agreements.
The respondent trade unions brought a motion to dismiss the complaint against them.
The Board granted the motion, finding that sections 64, 66, and 67(1) apply only to employers or their agents, not trade unions.
The Board further held that section 49 does not apply to multiple unions, the section 70 allegations lacked particulars and did not involve coercion to refrain from exercising rights, and the section 48 and 67(2) allegations were essentially an attempt to convert a jurisdictional dispute over work assignment into a representational issue.
The complaint against the respondent trade unions was dismissed.
