During family law proceedings, the responding party brought an oral motion seeking directions regarding outstanding undertakings, refusals, and questions taken under advisement arising from questioning under oath.
The court considered thirteen disputed requests for production and further questioning.
Several requests were denied where no undertaking had been given, where the documents were not in the moving party’s control, or where the request was overly broad or irrelevant to the issues in dispute.
Limited additional disclosure was ordered for certain financial documents, including bank statements and credit accounts, and in one instance the responding party was directed to request documents from a government ministry.
The court also permitted limited re‑attendance for further questioning in relation to some ordered disclosures.