The court determined the proper interpretation of a consulting retainer agreement governing contingent transaction fees for the sale of a business.
The respondents argued the fee provision should be interpreted as a staged structure applying 3.5% up to $6 million and 5% thereafter, while the applicant maintained the contract required 3.5% of the entire purchase price plus an additional 5% of the amount above $6 million.
The respondents sought to introduce extrinsic evidence including prior negotiations and industry standards to support their interpretation.
The court held the contractual language was clear and unambiguous despite producing a surprising result and declined to consider extrinsic evidence.
The applicant’s literal interpretation of the fee provision was upheld.