The defendants brought a motion to compel the plaintiff to attend independent medical examinations.
The plaintiff did not dispute the right to the examinations but sought to impose several restrictive conditions via a court order, including prohibitions on audio/video recording, questionnaires, and opinions on liability or credibility.
The court declined to impose a standard form order with the plaintiff's proposed terms, noting that many terms were either undisputed or overly broad.
The court ordered the plaintiff to attend the examinations, provided they could be arranged promptly, with reports complying with Rule 53.03(2.1).
