The appellant challenged a trial judgment on the basis that the corporate respondent's pleading lacked sufficient particulars and that the damages award was based on an excessive five-month period.
The Court of Appeal held that, although fuller particulars would have been preferable, it was clear the corporate respondent was advancing the claim accepted at trial.
The court further held that while it might have selected a shorter damages period, the trial judge's assessment was within the acceptable range.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
