The appellant, Antonio Duscio, appealed a 16-month imprisonment sentence for contempt of court, which was imposed shortly after a previous 12-month contempt sentence.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the sentencing judge's analysis of relevant legal principles or extensive factual findings.
The court noted that the appellant could secure early release by purging his contempt or providing a complete accounting of dissipated funds and assets.
The appeal was dismissed.