The appellant was convicted of aggravated assault following an incident at a shelter.
He appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial judge erred in admitting his unredacted criminal record and in finding that his statement to police was voluntary and not in breach of his s. 10(b) Charter rights.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's handling of the criminal record or her conclusion that no re-caution was required despite the passage of time, alleged memory loss, and change in jeopardy during the police interview.