Following an application regarding the continuation of a legal non-conforming use, the applicant sought costs of $60,186.30 on a partial indemnity basis.
The respondent argued for each party to bear their own costs due to divided success, or alternatively $20,000.
The court found there was genuinely divided success as the applicant was successful on the declaration but overreached on the injunction, which the respondent successfully resisted.
Applying Rule 57.01, the court awarded the applicant costs fixed at $38,000 all-inclusive.