3 total
Tribunal directed parties to attend a further status hearing regarding a historic de facto expropriation claim.
The claimants sought compensation for a historic de facto expropriation that occurred when the respondent municipality mistakenly constructed a road extension over their property.
At a case management conference, the tribunal was advised that the municipality was finalizing the formal expropriation and that the parties were engaged in mediation.
The tribunal directed the parties to attend a further status hearing and to prepare a draft procedural order if the matter did not settle.
Hearing on the merits converted to Case Management Conference due to lack of readiness.
The claimants sought compensation for an historic expropriation that occurred when the Township of Tay mistakenly constructed a road extension over their property.
The matter was scheduled for a three-day hearing on the merits.
However, due to the absence of a hearing plan, agreed statement of facts, and procedural order, the Tribunal determined the matter was not ready for a hearing.
With the consent of the parties, the hearing was converted to a Case Management Conference.
The parties agreed to attend a Tribunal-led mediation assessment and a subsequent status hearing.
Motion for costs dismissed as applicant failed to prove appellants engaged in unreasonable or vexatious conduct.
The applicant brought a motion for costs against the appellants, alleging unreasonable, frivolous, and vexatious conduct, as well as bad faith, resulting in unnecessary delays and expenses during an appeal of a zoning by-law amendment.
The Ontario Land Tribunal found no evidence to support the applicant's allegations of misconduct by the appellants.
The motion for costs was dismissed, and the appellants' request for costs for responding to the motion was also denied.
