The case concerned child support arrangements for the parties' two children.
The applicant mother sought child support based on the father's income, while the respondent father sought an offset amount based on a claim of shared parenting time (40% or more) under section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines.
The court conducted an hourly calculation of parenting time and found that the father did not meet the 40% threshold (3,491 hours vs. 3,504 required).
Consequently, the father's claim for shared parenting and offset support was dismissed.
The court ordered the father to pay the full table amount of child support based on his income for 2022, 2023, and an agreed-upon income for 2024 onwards.
The court also drew an adverse inference against the father for failing to provide updated financial disclosure and dismissed his claim for prior direct payments due to lack of proof.
