The appellant was convicted of sexual assault and voyeurism and appealed his convictions.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's assessment of evidence.
The court upheld the trial judge's rejection of the appellant's testimony, finding it illogical and inconsistent, consistent with the principles in R. v. W.(D.).
The court also rejected the appellant's submissions regarding an alleged mistaken inference about the complainant's age and its relation to consciousness of guilt, and a ground concerning the materiality of a photograph's date.
The sentence appeal was dismissed as abandoned.
