The complainant building trade unions alleged a violation of a consent access order by the respondents.
The respondents argued the order was spent.
The Board found a bona fide justification for the unions' continued need for access to the property to persuade employees to join, particularly given a competing certification application by the Steelworkers.
The Board declined to read a temporal limitation into the access order and declared it continued in effect until a vote is held or the certification applications are determined.
