The Receiver brought a motion seeking approval of its activities, approval of a sales process for two properties, and an order requiring a tenant to disclose tenancy documentation.
The court declined to grant a generic approval of the Receiver's activities, finding it unnecessary.
The court ordered the tenant to comply with its disclosure obligations, rejecting the tenant's confidentiality objections.
The court approved the proposed sales process and listing agreements, subject to conditions including a time-limited sealing order for appraisals and the circulation of redacted listing proposals to the parties.
