The plaintiffs brought a motion to remove the defendants' counsel of record, arguing that the lawyer was a necessary witness in the underlying estate litigation.
The lawyer had previously acted for the defendants in registering a section 71 notice against the deceased mother's property and in drafting a subsequent Power of Attorney and Will, all of which were central to the dispute over fiduciary duties.
The court applied the Essa factors and concluded that the lawyer was a material witness whose evidence would be necessary to explain the rationale behind the impugned transactions.
The court found that allowing the lawyer to act as counsel would create an irretrievable conflict between his obligations to the court and his clients.
The motion was granted and the lawyer was removed from the record.