The moving intervenor, a law firm holding writs of execution for unpaid legal fees against the defendants, moved to set aside a trial judgment that granted the plaintiffs specific performance of an agreement of purchase and sale.
The plaintiffs cross-moved for a declaration that the law firm's writs, registered after the agreement was signed, did not bind the land.
The court dismissed the law firm's motion, finding it lacked standing as an unsecured creditor to reopen the trial under Rule 52.01(3).
The court granted the plaintiffs' cross-motion, declaring that upon signing the agreement, the vendors conveyed equitable title, and subsequent writs of execution could not attach to the purchasers' equitable interest.