The appellants appealed a Small Claims Court decision granting judgment to the respondent insurer for $5,567.10.
The insurer had paid for massage therapy treatments but later discovered the appellant was not a licensed massage therapist.
The appellant argued the insurer paid her even after discovering she was unlicensed and raised a limitation period defence.
The Divisional Court found no error in the trial judge's conclusion that the appellant was not entitled to compensation as an unlicensed practitioner who had misrepresented her status on the treatment forms.
The appeal was dismissed.
