Patricia Nobl

The applicant sought judicial review of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment decision that denied her claim.

The PRRA officer gave little weight to a hospital discharge certificate detailing her husband's injuries, mistakenly believing a radius fracture to be a leg injury inconsistent with assault.

The Federal Court held this misapprehension of the evidence was unreasonable and material to the outcome.

The application for judicial review was granted and the matter returned for reconsideration of the medical evidence.

The applicant, a citizen of Haiti, sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision confirming the rejection of his refugee claim.

The claim was based on alleged death threats resulting from his involvement in dismissing employees.

The RAD found the applicant not credible due to inconsistencies in his account and his failure to provide reasonably available corroborating documentary evidence, such as employment records.

The Federal Court found the RAD's credibility findings to be reasonable, transparent, and justified.

The application for judicial review was dismissed.

The applicant, a citizen of Côte d'Ivoire, sought a stay of his removal from Canada.

His refugee claim and subsequent appeal to the Refugee Appeal Division were dismissed due to lack of credibility.

The applicant applied for leave and judicial review of the RAD decision out of time, thereby losing the automatic stay of removal.

A CBSA officer declined to defer his removal, noting the late filing and lack of new risks.

The Federal Court dismissed the motion for a stay of removal, finding no irreparable harm and that the CBSA officer's decision not to defer was reasonable.