The applicant sought judicial review of a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment decision that denied her claim.
The PRRA officer gave little weight to a hospital discharge certificate detailing her husband's injuries, mistakenly believing a radius fracture to be a leg injury inconsistent with assault.
The Federal Court held this misapprehension of the evidence was unreasonable and material to the outcome.
The application for judicial review was granted and the matter returned for reconsideration of the medical evidence.
