Court of Appeal for Ontario

Date: 2018-04-09 Docket: M48284 (C61429)

Panel: Epstein, Hourigan and Paciocco JJ.A.

Between

Matthew Weenen Plaintiff (Respondent/Responding Party)

and

Graziano Biadi Defendant (Appellant/Non-Party)

Counsel

Sarah Turney and Anastasia Reklitis, for the moving party, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP

Yan David Payne, for the responding party, Matthew Weenen

Heard: In writing

Addendum

[1] Following the release of this court's reasons on the Law Firm's motion for a charging order or solicitor's lien, the Law Firm wrote to the panel seeking an opportunity for a reconsideration of the decision. Specifically, it wanted to make submissions on the issue of whether it is entitled to a charging order or lien. Given that the Law Firm addressed the merits of obtaining a charging order in its written submissions and that the test for a charging order and solicitor's lien is the same, the request for a reconsideration is denied.

Gloria Epstein J.A.

C.W. Hourigan J.A.

David M. Paciocco J.A.