COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: Direk v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2014 ONCA 216

DATE: 20140321

DOCKET: C57834

MacFarland, Rouleau and Lauwers JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Ural Direk, Ertug Direkoglu, Kemal Direkoglu and Elif Direkoglu

Applicants

(Appellants)

and

Attorney General of Ontario;

Toronto Police Services Board

(Respondents)

Counsel:

Ural Direk and Kemal Direkoglu, acting in person

Josh Hunter, for the respondent Attorney General of Ontario

Ansuya Pachai, for the respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Heard: March 7, 2014

On appeal from the order of Justice David G. Stinson of the Superior Court of Justice, dated September 20, 2013.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1] The appellants appeal the order of Stinson J. permanently staying the Counter Application they have issued in the Superior Court of Justice Court File CV-09-386582. In paragraph 27 of his reasons, the motion judge summarizes the basis for his decision and concluded that “the Direks’ Counter-Application has no reasonable prospect of success.” We see no error in that determination. The appeal is dismissed. Approval of the order is dispensed with. No costs.