Court of Appeal for Ontario

CITATION: Misheal v. Okel, 2008 ONCA 674

DATE: 20081003

DOCKET: C48314

Before: Lang, Rouleau and Watt JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Peter Misheal

Applicant (Appellant)

and

Mona Okel (also known as Mulhima Okel)

Respondent (Respondent)

Counsel:

Peter Misheal, acting in person

Mona Okel, acting in person

Heard: October 1, 2008

On appeal from the order of Justice John Murray of the Superior Court of Justice, dated January 10, 2008.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1] There is no merit to this appeal. As Murray J. correctly concluded, the material filed failed to disclose a change in circumstances and failed to comply with rule 15(7) of the Family Law Rules regarding financial statements.

[2] Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

[3] Costs of the appeal payable by the appellant to the respondent fixed in the amount of $500, inclusive of disbursements and G.S.T.