CITATION: Fletcher v. Wannamaker, 2007 ONCA 850

DATE: 20071206

DOCKET: C46793

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

LASKIN, ROSENBERG and MACPHERSON JJ.A.

BETWEEN:

MICAH FLETCHER

Applicant (Respondent on Appeal)

and

PENNY WANNAMAKER, also known as PENNY FLETCHER

Respondent (Appellant on Appeal)

Shawn Campbell for the appellant

Micah Fletcher in person

Heard: December 5, 2007

On appeal from the order of Justice Robert E. Zelinski of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 6, 2007.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1] The appellant argues three grounds of appeal: first, the trial judge erred in the amount of income he imputed to the respondent; second, the trial judge erred in the credit that he gave the respondent in the calculation of retroactive support; and third, the trial judge erred in the allocation of responsibility for the child’s university expenses. On each ground of appeal the trial judge made findings of fact, which are supported by the record.

[2] Accordingly, we have no basis to interfere with these findings. The appeal is therefore dismissed, with costs fixed at $200, inclusive of disbursements and G.S.T.