CITATION: Miskokomon v. Canada (Attorney General), 2007 ONCA 386
DATE: 20070523
DOCKET: C43122
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
LASKIN, MACPHERSON and LAFORME JJ.A.
BETWEEN:
MARSHA MISKOKOMON, JACQUELINE MISKOKOMON, DANIEL R. MISKOKOMON, CHRISTOPHER VAUGH MISKOKOMON, CODY CLEMENT MISKOKOMON, VAUGHN PAUL MISKOKOMON, VALERIE DAWN MISKOKOMON, DAWN-ESTELLE IRIS MISKOKOMON, MOLLY ANN MISKOKOMON, BRENDAN MICHAEL SANDS, MICHAEL HENRY SANDS and the minor plaintiffs ROBERT DANIEL MISKOKOMON, BRETT RAYMOND MISKOKOMON, KARA DANIELLE MISKOKOMON, KRISTIN RENEE WIMAN, JODIE LEIGH JEAN WIMAN, HANNAH ARLENE WIMAN, JULIE MARLA MISKOKOMON, IRIS BLOSSOM MISKOKOMON, and MARCUS VALAN MISKOKOMON-HUFF by their Litigation Guardian WILLIAM E. GREENLEY
Plaintiffs/Respondents
and
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, DARLENE MISKOKOMON AND COLLEEN MISKOKOMON
Defendants/Appellant
Jacqueline Dais-Visa for the appellant
Aaron Detlor for the respondents
Heard and released orally: May 18, 2007
On appeal from the order of Justice Sarah E. Pepall of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 9, 2005.
APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT
[1] In the light of the recital and paragraph one of the formal order of Pepall J., we are of the view that for the purpose of the motion before her, the challenge to her jurisdiction was abandoned. Also, in our view, Pepall J.’s order is of no precedential value on the question of jurisdiction.
[2] The appeal is dismissed, with costs fixed at $5,000, all inclusive.