Ontario Labour Relations Board

The applicant, The Corporation of the City of London, requested to withdraw its application against Greenway P.C.C. and the Ministry of Labour.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant filed an application against the employer and the Ministry of Labour.

Having regard to the agreement reached by the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the application terminated.

The applicant, Inco Limited, and the responding parties, United Steelworkers of America Local 6500 and the Ministry of Labour, agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not to exceed one year.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the adjournment on consent.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement acknowledging that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement and had violated its terms.

The Board issued a consent order declaring the responding party bound by the collective agreement and ordering it to pay $1,767.25 in unpaid wages and vacation pay, along with health, welfare, training, and union dues remittances.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against the union, relying on a claim that she applied for a full-time position in 1997.

The union and the intervenor employer requested that the Board dismiss the application due to extreme delay and failure to disclose a prima facie case.

The Board directed the applicant to file submissions responding to the request to dismiss before deciding whether to inquire further into the application.

The applicant applied to decertify the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor hospital.

The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant unions filed an application under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.

Following an officer's report that issues remained in dispute, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the parties to file briefs and documents outlining the disputed issues and facts.

The Board scheduled a consultation to hear representations and potentially render a final decision on the unsettled matters.

The employer was directed to post copies of the decision.

The applicant employer and respondent union filed a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.

Notice of the application was posted, and no objections were filed by any affected employees.

The Board granted consent to the early termination, noting that the current agreement would expire on November 4, 2001, and a newly ratified agreement would take effect on November 5, 2001.

The parties in a labour relations matter reached a Memorandum of Agreement regarding procedural matters, including document disclosure, the order of proceedings, and the use of produced documents.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board endorsed the agreement and directed the parties to adhere to the outlined process.

The applicant filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Counsel for one of the responding parties advised the Board that it did not receive the application, although the applicant's Certificate of Delivery indicated it was delivered.

The Board directed the applicant's counsel to ensure the responding party receives a copy and extended the time for filing a response to 10 days after receipt.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicants sought to amend their application to add the National Union as a responding party.

The Board granted the amendment, noting its practice of allowing applicants to select their responding parties, though it cautioned that this did not mean the selection was appropriate.

The Board also directed the applicants to provide submissions responding to the locals' motion to dismiss the application as untimely, given that the most recent event occurred more than two years prior to the application.

The applicant union filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging unfair labour practices and indicating an intent to rely on section 11 for its certification application.

The union requested that the section 96 application be consolidated with the certification application and that the ballot box from the upcoming representation vote be sealed.

The Board directed that the matters be listed to be heard together but denied the request to seal the ballot box, finding no pressing reason to do so.

The applicant requested an adjournment sine die of the application.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken, with segregated ballots for disputed positions including maintenance, truck drivers, group leaders, and distribution coordinators.

The applicant filed a termination application seeking to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and the union failing to particularize its allegations of employer interference under section 63(13) of the Act, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The Board also declined to schedule the union's grievance referral for hearing until the union clarified its intentions regarding a related employer application under section 1(4) of the Act.

The Minister of Labour referred a matter to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under subsection 3(2) of the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act.

The parties agreed to adjourn the matter sine die and the hearing dates were cancelled.

The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, subject to any objection from the Minister of Labour within ten days.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against Magna of London (Mega Plas).

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.