The appellant challenged a municipal licensing bylaw regulating body rub parlours, arguing it had the effect of virtually prohibiting them due to a lack of available commercial space meeting the bylaw's criteria.
The application judge dismissed the challenge, finding the municipality properly assessed relocation opportunities and was not responsible for market conditions or landlords' unwillingness to lease to such businesses.
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision, confirming that the municipality had no legal obligation to ensure favourable market conditions before exercising its statutory authority to regulate.