The appellant, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident at age 10, appealed an Arbitrator's decision denying him non-earner benefits (NEBs) under the SABS-1996.
The Arbitrator found that the appellant did not suffer a complete inability to carry on a normal life within 104 weeks of the accident, nor when he turned 16.
The appellant argued that the insurer's failure to provide proper notices of refusal procedurally entitled him to benefits.
The Director's Delegate upheld the Arbitrator's decision, confirming that under the Court of Appeal's decision in Stranges, procedural breaches by an insurer do not automatically entitle an insured to benefits without proving substantive entitlement.
The appeal was dismissed.