No one in attendance

In an uncontested family law trial, the applicant sought child support, spousal support, equalization, and a vesting order for the matrimonial home.

The respondent's pleadings had been struck for persistent non-compliance with court orders.

The court imputed the respondent's income at $100,000 and awarded lump sum child support, section 7 expenses, and spousal support due to the respondent's failure to pay and the significant needs of the parties' severely autistic child.

The court also ordered an equalization payment of $518,508.71.

To enforce these obligations, the court granted a vesting order transferring the respondent's interest in the matrimonial home to the applicant so it could be sold and the proceeds used to satisfy the amounts owed.

Following a judgment, the plaintiffs requested a reconsideration based on allegations of misleading and inaccurate evidence.

The court declined to reconsider the decision but issued supplemental reasons varying the judgment to stay enforcement pending the determination of the plaintiffs' upcoming summary judgment motion.