The appellants appealed the City of Brampton Committee of Adjustment's refusal of their applications for provisional consent to sever a lot and for minor variances to lot width.
Prior to the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.
Based on uncontroverted expert planning evidence, the Tribunal found that the proposed consent had regard for provincial interests and the criteria in section 51(24) of the Planning Act, and that the minor variances met the four tests under section 45(1).
The appeals were allowed in part, granting provisional consent and authorizing the variances subject to agreed-upon conditions.