The plaintiff brought a motion to compel additional financial disclosure and for a finding of contempt against the defendants for allegedly breaching prior court orders requiring answers to written questions and disclosure.
The court dismissed the contempt motion, finding that conflicting affidavit evidence prevented a finding of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court also declined to order additional disclosure, holding that the plaintiff must first conduct an examination in aid of execution under Rule 60.18 before seeking such relief by motion.
